Gómez-Lus R, Rubio M C, García C, Gómez-Lus M L, Alejandre M C
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1987;13(3):155-9.
The in vitro activity of ceftizoxime was compared with that of other beta-lactam antibiotics against 331 aminoglycoside (AG)-resistant clinical isolates. Two hundred and six AG-resistant, beta-lactamase producing, R-plasmid harbouring Enterobacteriaceae strains had MICs ranging from 0.0125 to 0.063 mg/l. AG-resistant Escherichia coli (36 strains) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19) had MIC 90 values of 8 mg/l. Proteus rettgeri and P. vulgaris as well as Morganella morganii, resistant to several AGs, had MICs ranging from 0.5 to 4 mg/ml. Against all six isolates of AG-resistant Salmonella enteritidis the MIC90 was 0.5 mg/l. Twenty-seven strains of Serratia marcescens, most of which were resistant to beta-lactam and AG antibiotics, had MICs ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg/l. The AG-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae producing several AG-modifying enzymes (AAC(3); AAC(2'); AAC(6'); APH(3')) showed MICs ranging from 0.6 to 4 mg/l. Against 10 AG-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing AAC(3), AAC(6') and APH(3') enzymes, the MICs ranged from 16 to 64 mg/l. In conclusion, ceftizoxime was equally or more active than cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftazidime and moxalactam against AG-resistant E. coli, Klebsiella, Morganella, Proteus, Serratia, Salmonella and R-plasmid harbouring Enterobacteriaceae. Ceftizoxime was less active than cefotaxime, moxalactam and ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa.
将头孢唑肟的体外活性与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素针对331株氨基糖苷类(AG)耐药临床分离株的活性进行了比较。206株携带R质粒、产β-内酰胺酶的AG耐药肠杆菌科菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)范围为0.0125至0.063mg/l。AG耐药的大肠埃希菌(36株)和肺炎克雷伯菌(19株)的MIC90值为8mg/l。雷氏普罗威登斯菌、普通变形杆菌以及摩根摩根菌对多种AG耐药,其MIC范围为0.5至4mg/ml。针对所有6株AG耐药肠炎沙门菌,MIC90为0.5mg/l。27株粘质沙雷菌,其中大多数对β-内酰胺类和AG类抗生素耐药,其MIC范围为0.5至8mg/l。产生多种AG修饰酶(AAC(3);AAC(2');AAC(6');APH(3'))的AG耐药肠杆菌科菌株的MIC范围为0.6至4mg/l。针对10株产生AAC(3)、AAC(6')和APH(3')酶的AG耐药铜绿假单胞菌,MIC范围为16至64mg/l。总之,在针对AG耐药的大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌、摩根菌、变形杆菌、沙雷菌、沙门菌以及携带R质粒的肠杆菌科细菌方面,头孢唑肟的活性与头孢噻肟、头孢哌酮、头孢他啶和拉氧头孢相当或更高。在针对铜绿假单胞菌方面,头孢唑肟的活性低于头孢噻肟、拉氧头孢和头孢他啶。