Suppr超能文献

γ-氨基丁酸能镇静剂对重症监护病房拔管后谵妄风险的不同影响:来自新英格兰医疗保健网络的一项回顾性队列研究

Differential Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acidergic Sedatives on Risk of Post-Extubation Delirium in the ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Health Care Network.

作者信息

Azimaraghi Omid, Wongtangman Karuna, Wachtendorf Luca J, Santer Peter, Rumyantsev Sandra, Ahn Curie, Kiyatkin Michael E, Teja Bijan, Sarge Todd, Subramaniam Balachundhar, Eikermann Matthias

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2022 May 1;50(5):e434-e444. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005425. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether different gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) sedatives such as propofol and benzodiazepines carry differential risks of post-extubation delirium in the ICU.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Seven ICUs in an academic hospital network, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA).

PATIENTS

Ten thousand five hundred and one adult patients mechanically ventilated for over 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We tested the hypothesis that benzodiazepine versus propofol-based sedation is associated with fewer delirium-free days within 14 days after extubation. Further, we hypothesized that the measured sedation level evoked by GABAergic drugs is a better predictor of delirium than the drug dose administered. The proportion of GABAergic drug-induced deep sedation was defined as the ratio of days with a mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of less than or equal to -3 during mechanical ventilation. Multivariable regression and effect modification analyses were used. Delirium-free days were lower in patients who received a high proportion of deep sedation using benzodiazepine compared with propofol-based sedation (adjusted absolute difference, -1.17 d; 95% CI, -0.64 to -1.69; p < 0.001). This differential effect was magnified in elderly patients (age > 65) and in patients with liver or kidney failure (p-for-interaction < 0.001) but not observed in patients who received a low proportion of deep sedation (p = 0.95). GABAergic-induced deep sedation days during mechanical ventilation was a better predictor of post-extubation delirium than the GABAergic daily average effective dose (area under the curve 0.76 vs 0.69; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Deep sedation during mechanical ventilation with benzodiazepines compared with propofol is associated with increased risk of post-extubation delirium. Our data do not support the view that benzodiazepine-based compared with propofol-based sedation in the ICU is an independent risk factor of delirium, as long as deep sedation can be avoided in these patients.

摘要

目的

评估不同的γ-氨基丁酸能(GABAergic)镇静剂,如丙泊酚和苯二氮䓬类药物,在重症监护病房(ICU)中拔管后谵妄的风险是否存在差异。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(马萨诸塞州波士顿)学术医院网络中的七个ICU。

患者

10501例接受机械通气超过24小时的成年患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

我们检验了以下假设,即与丙泊酚镇静相比,苯二氮䓬类药物镇静与拔管后14天内无谵妄天数较少有关。此外,我们假设GABAergic药物引起的测量镇静水平比给药剂量更能预测谵妄。GABAergic药物诱导的深度镇静比例定义为机械通气期间平均Richmond躁动-镇静量表小于或等于-3的天数比例。采用多变量回归和效应修正分析。与丙泊酚镇静相比,接受高比例苯二氮䓬类药物深度镇静的患者无谵妄天数更低(校正绝对差异,-1.17天;95%置信区间,-0.64至-1.69;p<0.001)。这种差异效应在老年患者(年龄>65岁)和肝肾功能衰竭患者中放大(交互作用p值<0.001),但在接受低比例深度镇静的患者中未观察到(p = 0.95)。机械通气期间GABAergic诱导的深度镇静天数比GABAergic每日平均有效剂量更能预测拔管后谵妄(曲线下面积0.76对0.69;p<0.001)。

结论

与丙泊酚相比,机械通气期间使用苯二氮䓬类药物进行深度镇静与拔管后谵妄风险增加有关。我们的数据不支持以下观点,即在ICU中,与丙泊酚镇静相比,苯二氮䓬类药物镇静是谵妄的独立危险因素,只要能避免这些患者的深度镇静。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验