镇静策略与 ICU 谵妄:一项多中心、基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Sedation strategy and ICU delirium: a multicentre, population-based propensity score-matched cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 20;11(7):e045087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045087.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined the relationship between dominant sedation strategy, risk of delirium and patient-centred outcomes in adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).

DESIGN

Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

SETTING

Mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to four Canadian hospital medical/surgical ICUs from 2014 to 2016 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

2837 mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) requiring admission to a medical/surgical ICU were evaluated for the relationship between sedation strategy and delirium.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary exposure was dominant sedation strategy, defined as the sedative infusion, including midazolam, propofol or fentanyl, with the longest duration before the first delirium assessment. The primary outcome was 'ever delirium' identified using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), ventilation duration and days with delirium. The cohort was analysed in two propensity score (patient characteristics and therapies received) matched cohorts (propofol vs fentanyl and propofol vs midazolam).

RESULTS

2837 patients (60.7% male; median age 57 years (IQR 43-68)) were considered for propensity matching. In propensity score-matched cohorts(propofol vs midazolam, n=712; propofol vs fentanyl, n=1732), the odds of delirium were significantly higher with midazolam (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.00)) and fentanyl (OR 1.22 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.48)) compared with propofol dominant sedation strategies. Dominant sedation strategy with midazolam and fentanyl were associated with a longer duration of ventilation compared with propofol. Fentanyl was also associated with increased ICU mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.12)) ICU and hospital LOS compared with a propofol dominant sedation strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a novel association between fentanyl dominant sedation strategies and an increased risk of delirium, a composite outcome of delirium or death, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS. Midazolam dominant sedation strategies were associated with increased delirium risk and mechanical ventilation duration.

摘要

目的

我们研究了成人重症监护病房(ICU)中主要镇静策略、谵妄风险和以患者为中心的结局之间的关系。

设计

回顾性倾向匹配队列研究。

地点

2014 年至 2016 年,加拿大艾伯塔省卡尔加里市四家加拿大医院的内科/外科 ICU 中接受机械通气的成年人(≥18 岁)。

参与者

2837 名需要入住内科/外科 ICU 的接受机械通气的成年人(≥18 岁)接受了镇静策略与谵妄之间关系的评估。

干预措施

无。

主要和次要结果测量

主要暴露是主要镇静策略,定义为在首次谵妄评估前持续时间最长的镇静输注,包括咪达唑仑、丙泊酚或芬太尼。主要结局是使用 ICU 谵妄筛查检查表确定的“是否存在谵妄”。次要结局包括死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、通气时间和谵妄天数。该队列在两个倾向评分(患者特征和接受的治疗)匹配队列(丙泊酚与芬太尼和丙泊酚与咪达唑仑)中进行了分析。

结果

2837 名患者(60.7%为男性;中位年龄 57 岁(IQR 43-68))被认为适合进行倾向评分匹配。在倾向评分匹配的队列(丙泊酚与咪达唑仑,n=712;丙泊酚与芬太尼,n=1732)中,与丙泊酚主导的镇静策略相比,咪达唑仑(OR 1.46(95%CI 1.06-2.00))和芬太尼(OR 1.22(95%CI 1.00-1.48))导致谵妄的可能性显著更高。与丙泊酚主导的镇静策略相比,咪达唑仑和芬太尼主导的镇静策略与通气时间延长有关。与丙泊酚主导的镇静策略相比,芬太尼还与 ICU 死亡率(OR 1.50,95%CI 1.07-2.12))和 ICU 和医院 LOS 增加相关。

结论

我们发现了一种新的关联,即芬太尼主导的镇静策略与谵妄风险增加、谵妄或死亡、机械通气时间、ICU LOS 和医院 LOS 的复合结局之间存在关联。咪达唑仑主导的镇静策略与谵妄风险增加和机械通气时间延长有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16d8/8292822/03cc86ec8778/bmjopen-2020-045087f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索