Sharma Dibya J, Deb Aparajita, Sarma Phulen, Mallick Bipadabhanjan, Bhattacharjee Prithwiraj
Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, IND.
Internal Medicine, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, IND.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 28;13(11):e19976. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19976. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Introduction As per the COVID-19 treatment guidelines of India, remdesivir and convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) are indicated in moderate and severe patients. In this study, we have evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of remdesivir versus remdesivir CPT combination and effect of early versus late initiation of remdesivir. Materials and methods A hospital-based observational study was conducted among hospitalized moderate and severe COVID-19 patients treated with either remdesivir and/or CPT as per national guidelines. Response to therapy was evaluated in terms of mortality, mechanical ventilation requirement, ICU requirement, and safety. Results and observations A total of 95 moderate and severe COVID-19 patients on remdesivir (n=35) or remdesivir + CPT combination (n=60) were included. Both the remdesivir and remdesivir + CPT groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics, however, proportion of patients with baseline serum creatinine >1.5 was higher in the remdesivir group. No difference was seen between both the groups in terms of mortality, mechanical ventilation requirement, ICU requirement, and safety parameters in the overall moderate and severe COVID-19 populations and when each of these severity categories (moderate and severe) were analyzed separately. Early initiation (<9 days from symptom onset) of remdesivir was associated with better treatment outcome in terms of mortality and requirement of ICU. Post-therapy shortness of breath and LFTs (liver function tests) elevation was more in the late initiation of remdesivir group, which may be due to the lack of efficacy and subsequent disease progression or a direct effect of the drug. The beneficial effect of remdesivir was maintained even after adjustment for important prognostic factors and baseline imbalances (age, sex, disease severity, CPT use, and serum creatinine level). Conclusions Early initiation of remdesivir was associated with clinical benefit in terms of mortality and mechanical ventilation requirement. However, addition of convalescent plasma therapy as an additional therapeutic modality to remdesivir was not found to be beneficial.
引言 根据印度的新型冠状病毒肺炎治疗指南,瑞德西韦和恢复期血浆疗法(CPT)适用于中度和重度患者。在本研究中,我们评估了瑞德西韦与瑞德西韦联合CPT的相对安全性和疗效,以及瑞德西韦早期与晚期开始使用的效果。
材料与方法 对按照国家指南接受瑞德西韦和/或CPT治疗的住院中度和重度新型冠状病毒肺炎患者进行了一项基于医院的观察性研究。从死亡率、机械通气需求、重症监护病房(ICU)需求和安全性方面评估治疗反应。
结果与观察 总共纳入了95例接受瑞德西韦治疗(n = 35)或瑞德西韦+CPT联合治疗(n = 60)的中度和重度新型冠状病毒肺炎患者。瑞德西韦组和瑞德西韦+CPT组在基线特征方面具有可比性,然而,瑞德西韦组中基线血清肌酐>1.5的患者比例更高。在总体中度和重度新型冠状病毒肺炎人群中以及分别分析每个严重程度类别(中度和重度)时,两组在死亡率、机械通气需求、ICU需求和安全性参数方面均未发现差异。瑞德西韦早期开始使用(症状出现后<9天)在死亡率和ICU需求方面与更好的治疗结果相关。瑞德西韦组晚期开始使用时,治疗后呼吸急促和肝功能检查(LFTs)升高更为明显,这可能是由于缺乏疗效以及随后的疾病进展或药物的直接作用。即使在对重要的预后因素和基线不平衡(年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、CPT使用情况和血清肌酐水平)进行调整后,瑞德西韦的有益效果仍然存在。
结论 瑞德西韦早期开始使用在死亡率和机械通气需求方面具有临床益处。然而,未发现将恢复期血浆疗法作为瑞德西韦的额外治疗方式有益。