• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对急诊科大量输血方案启动的影响。

The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on activation of the massive transfusion protocol in the emergency department.

作者信息

Yang Cheng-Xin, Lin Pei-Chin, Chang Chih-Chun, Tsai Huang-Wen, Sun Jen-Tang

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Clinical Pathology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2022 May;117(5):729-732. doi: 10.1111/vox.13238. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1111/vox.13238
PMID:34984685
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in mid-May of 2021 in Taiwan. After 2 months of hard work, transmissions were successfully prevented and the number of newly confirmed COVID-19 cases fell remarkably. We evaluated the impact of this outbreak on the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in the emergency department (ED) of a trauma centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the activation and efficacy of MTP before, during and after the outbreak by analysing the clinical data relevant to MTP activations.

RESULTS

There was no remarkable change in the average number of MTP triggers per month during the outbreak. The interval from an MTP trigger to the first unit of blood transfused at bedside was significantly increased during the outbreak compared to that before the outbreak (22.4 min vs. 13.9 min, p < 0.001); while the 24-h survival rate decreased (57.1% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.938). There were no remarkable changes in blood unit return or wastage during the outbreak.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 outbreak limitedly affected MTP activation and waste of blood products, but significantly increased the interval from an MTP trigger to the first unit of blood transfused at bedside.

摘要

背景与目的

2021年5月中旬台湾地区发生了新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情。经过两个月的艰苦努力,成功阻止了病毒传播,COVID-19新确诊病例数显著下降。我们评估了此次疫情对一家创伤中心急诊科大量输血方案(MTP)的影响。

材料与方法

通过分析与MTP启动相关的临床数据,回顾性比较疫情爆发前、爆发期间和爆发后MTP的启动情况及效果。

结果

疫情爆发期间每月MTP启动的平均次数没有显著变化。与疫情爆发前相比,疫情爆发期间从MTP启动到床边首次输血的时间间隔显著延长(22.4分钟对13.9分钟,p<0.001);而24小时生存率下降(57.1%对71.1%,p=0.938)。疫情爆发期间血液制品的回收或浪费情况没有显著变化。

结论

COVID-19疫情对MTP的启动和血液制品的浪费影响有限,但显著延长了从MTP启动到床边首次输血的时间间隔。

相似文献

1
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on activation of the massive transfusion protocol in the emergency department.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对急诊科大量输血方案启动的影响。
Vox Sang. 2022 May;117(5):729-732. doi: 10.1111/vox.13238. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Emergency red cells first: Rapid response or speed bump? The evolution of a massive transfusion protocol for trauma in a single UK centre.先输注紧急红细胞:快速反应还是障碍?英国单个中心创伤大量输血方案的演变
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1772-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 May 31.
3
Effectiveness of massive transfusion protocol activation in pre-hospital setting for major trauma.创伤患者院前大量输血方案的有效性。
Injury. 2022 May;53(5):1581-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.047. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
4
Efficacy of a massive transfusion protocol for hemorrhagic trauma resuscitation.大出血创伤复苏中采用大量输血方案的疗效。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1178-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.060. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
5
Implementation of a Massive Transfusion Protocol: Evaluation of Its Use and Efficacy.大量输血方案的实施:其应用与疗效评估
J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;25(2):92-97. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000350.
6
Blood Product Utilization Among Trauma and Nontrauma Massive Transfusion Protocols at an Urban Academic Medical Center.城市学术医疗中心创伤与非创伤大量输血方案中的血液制品使用情况
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):967-974. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002253.
7
Implementation of a pediatric trauma massive transfusion protocol: one institution's experience.实施小儿创伤大量输血方案:一家机构的经验。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03458.x. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
8
How did we reform our out of control massive transfusion protocol program?我们是如何改革失控的大量输血方案的?
Transfusion. 2021 Nov;61(11):3066-3074. doi: 10.1111/trf.16706. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
9
Incidence of Red Cell Antibody Formation Following Massive Transfusion Protocol: Experience of a Single Institution.大量输血方案后红细胞抗体形成的发生率:单中心经验。
Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4715-4719. doi: 10.1177/00031348221129500. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
Massive transfusion protocols in the Netherlands. Consensus or confusion?荷兰的大量输血方案。共识还是困惑?
Injury. 2022 Jan;53(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Proactive consultation of laboratory medicine increased diagnostic rate of multiple myeloma: One single center's 12-year experience.主动咨询检验科提高多发性骨髓瘤的诊断率:单中心 12 年经验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38523. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038523.
2
Reply to Jacobs et al.: Massive transfusion protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic.对雅各布斯等人的回复:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的大量输血方案
Vox Sang. 2022 Jun;117(6):870-871. doi: 10.1111/vox.13268. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
Massive transfusion protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Vox Sang. 2022 Jun;117(6):869. doi: 10.1111/vox.13269. Epub 2022 Mar 29.