Suppr超能文献

狼疮带试验用于系统性红斑狼疮的诊断评估。

Lupus band test for diagnostic evaluation in systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Wongtada Chanidapa, Kerr Stephen J, Rerknimitr Pawinee

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Skin and Allergy Research Unit, 26683Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Center for Excellence in Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, 26683Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Lupus. 2022 Mar;31(3):363-366. doi: 10.1177/09612033211066459. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lupus band test (LBT) using a sample of clinically normal skin was proposed as a useful diagnostic test for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is mostly performed to help diagnosing SLE in patients with insufficient clinical and serological profiles. However, most published studies on its utility are outdated and the results remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of LBT on non-lesion sun-protected (NLSP) and sun-exposed (NLSE) skin for SLE.

METHODS

Consecutively presenting patients with clinical and serological suspicion of SLE who had LBT performed on non-lesion skin during January 2012 to August 2021 were retrospectively studied. LBT performed on either NLSE or NLSP skin biopsies were all included. Laboratory characteristics, number, types and patterns of deposited immunoreactants and disease activity were also assessed.

RESULTS

LBT was performed in 57 patients with suspected SLE. LBT was positive in 18/57, 9/28 and 6/21 patients in overall non-lesion, NLSE and NLSP, respectively. Of all patients, 23 patients were diagnosed with SLE and 34 patients with other diseases. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of LBT on non-lesion skin was 56.5% and 88.2%, respectively. The ability of the test to discriminate between those with and without SLE, assessed by the area under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve, was 0.72 (0.61-0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of LBT on NLSE skin was 58.3% and 87.5% while those of NLSP skin, were 57.1% and 85.7%, respectively. We found no significant correlation between the positivity of LBT and overall disease activity. Types, number and pattern of deposited immunoreactants also showed no correlation with disease activity (all > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Used as a diagnostic adjunct, non-lesion LBT is still of value for diagnosing SLE in inconclusive cases.

摘要

背景

狼疮带试验(LBT)采用临床正常皮肤样本,被提议作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的一种有用诊断试验。它主要用于在临床和血清学特征不足的患者中辅助诊断SLE。然而,大多数已发表的关于其效用的研究都过时了,结果仍存在争议。

目的

确定LBT对SLE在非病变防晒(NLSP)和日晒部位(NLSE)皮肤的诊断性能。

方法

回顾性研究2012年1月至2021年8月期间连续就诊、临床和血清学怀疑患有SLE且在非病变皮肤进行了LBT的患者。纳入在NLSE或NLSP皮肤活检上进行的LBT。还评估了实验室特征、沉积免疫反应物的数量、类型和模式以及疾病活动度。

结果

对57例疑似SLE患者进行了LBT。在总体非病变、NLSE和NLSP皮肤中,LBT阳性的患者分别为18/57、9/28和6/21。所有患者中,23例被诊断为SLE,34例患有其他疾病。总体而言,LBT在非病变皮肤的敏感性和特异性分别为56.5%和88.2%。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积评估,该试验区分有无SLE患者的能力为0.72(0.61 - 0.84)。LBT在NLSE皮肤的敏感性和特异性分别为58.3%和87.5%,而在NLSP皮肤的敏感性和特异性分别为57. and 85.7%。我们发现LBT阳性与总体疾病活动度之间无显著相关性。沉积免疫反应物的类型、数量和模式也与疾病活动度无相关性(均>0.05)。

结论

作为一种诊断辅助手段,非病变LBT在诊断不明确的SLE病例中仍有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验