Department of Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Duke Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cancer Med. 2022 Feb;11(4):1099-1108. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4517. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
Controversy exists regarding the optimal sequence of chemotherapy among women with operable node-negative breast cancers with high-risk tumor biology. We evaluated national patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use among women with early-stage HER2+, triple-negative (TNBC), and high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) invasive breast cancers.
Women ≥18 years with cT1-2/cN0 HER2+, TNBC, or high recurrence risk score (≥31) HR+ invasive breast cancers who received chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). Cochran-Armitage and logistic regression examined temporal trends and likelihood of undergoing NACT versus adjuvant chemotherapy based on patient age and molecular subtype.
Overall, 96,622 patients met study criteria; 25% received NACT and 75% underwent surgery first, with comparable 5-year estimates of overall survival (0.90, 95% CI 0.892-0.905 vs 0.91, 95% CI 0.907-0.913). During the study period, utilization of NACT increased from 14% to 36% and varied according to molecular subtype (year*molecular subtype p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001). Women with HER2+ (OR 4.17, 95% CI 3.70-4.60, p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001) and TNBC (OR 3.81, 95% CI 3.38-4.31, p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001) were more likely to receive NACT over time, without a change in use among those with HR+ disease (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.88-2.87, p = 0.13, p-corrected = 0.17).
Among women with early-stage triple-negative and HER2+ breast cancers, utilization of NACT increased over time, a trend that correlates with previously reported improved rates of pCR and options post-neoadjuvant treatment with residual disease. Future research is needed to better understand multidisciplinary decisions for NACT and implications for breast cancer patients.
对于具有高危肿瘤生物学特征的可手术淋巴结阴性乳腺癌女性,化疗的最佳顺序存在争议。我们评估了全国范围内新辅助化疗(NACT)在早期 HER2+、三阴性(TNBC)和高复发风险评分(≥31)激素受体阳性(HR+)浸润性乳腺癌女性中的使用情况。
在国家癌症数据库(2010-2016 年)中,确定了接受化疗的年龄≥18 岁的 cT1-2/cN0 HER2+、TNBC 或高复发风险评分(≥31)HR+浸润性乳腺癌女性。Cochran-Armitage 和逻辑回归分析考察了根据患者年龄和分子亚型,NACT 与辅助化疗的时间趋势和可能性。
总体而言,96622 名患者符合研究标准;25%接受了 NACT,75%先进行了手术,5 年总生存率的估计值相当(0.90,95%CI 0.892-0.905 与 0.91,95%CI 0.907-0.913)。在此研究期间,NACT 的使用率从 14%增加到 36%,并根据分子亚型而变化(年*分子亚型 p<0.001,p-校正<0.001)。HER2+(OR 4.17,95%CI 3.70-4.60,p<0.001,p-校正<0.001)和 TNBC(OR 3.81,95%CI 3.38-4.31,p<0.001,p-校正<0.001)患者更有可能随着时间的推移接受 NACT,而 HR+疾病患者的 NACT 使用率没有变化(OR 1.58,95%CI 0.88-2.87,p=0.13,p-校正=0.17)。
在早期三阴性和 HER2+乳腺癌女性中,NACT 的使用率随着时间的推移而增加,这一趋势与先前报道的 pCR 率提高以及新辅助治疗后残留疾病的选择相关。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解 NACT 的多学科决策及其对乳腺癌患者的影响。