Holmberg Mathias J, Granfeldt Asger, Mentzelopoulos Spyros D, Andersen Lars W
Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Resuscitation. 2022 Feb;171:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.12.030. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
To perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of vasopressin and glucocorticoids for the treatment of cardiac arrest.
The PRISMA-IPD guidelines were followed. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized trials comparing vasopressin and glucocorticoids to placebo during cardiac arrest. The population included adults with cardiac arrest in any setting. Pairs of investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using individual participant data. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate posterior treatment effects assuming various prior beliefs. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.
Three trials were identified including adult in-hospital cardiac arrests only. Individual participant data were obtained from all trials yielding a total of 869 patients. There was some heterogeneity in post-cardiac arrest interventions between the trials. The results favored vasopressin and glucocorticoids for return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio: 2.09, 95%CI: 1.54 to 2.84, moderate certainty). Estimates for survival at discharge (odds ratio: 1.39, 95%CI: 0.90 to 2.14, low certainty) and favorable neurological outcome (odds ratio: 1.64, 95%CI, 0.99 to 2.72, low certainty) were more uncertain. The Bayesian estimates for return of spontaneous circulation were consistent with the primary analyses, whereas the estimates for survival at discharge and favorable neurological outcome were more dependent on the prior belief.
Among adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest, vasopressin and glucocorticoids compared to placebo, improved return of spontaneous circulation. Larger trials are needed to determine whether there is an effect on longer-term outcomes.
对血管加压素和糖皮质激素治疗心脏骤停进行系统评价和个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
遵循PRISMA-IPD指南。我们检索了Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找在心脏骤停期间将血管加压素和糖皮质激素与安慰剂进行比较的随机试验。研究对象包括任何情况下发生心脏骤停的成年人。由两组研究人员对研究的相关性进行审查、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用个体参与者数据进行荟萃分析。采用贝叶斯框架,在假设各种先验信念的情况下估计后验治疗效果。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。
共识别出三项试验,均仅纳入成年住院患者心脏骤停病例。从所有试验中获取了个体参与者数据,共计869例患者。各试验之间心脏骤停后的干预措施存在一定异质性。结果显示血管加压素和糖皮质激素有利于自主循环恢复(优势比:2.09,95%置信区间:1.54至2.84,中等确定性)。出院时生存率(优势比:1.39,95%置信区间:0.90至2.14,低确定性)和良好神经功能结局(优势比:1.64,95%置信区间:0.99至2.72,低确定性)的估计更不确定。自主循环恢复的贝叶斯估计与主要分析结果一致,而出院时生存率和良好神经功能结局的估计更依赖于先验信念。
在成年住院心脏骤停患者中,与安慰剂相比,血管加压素和糖皮质激素可改善自主循环恢复。需要开展更大规模的试验来确定对长期结局是否有影响。