• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉血运重建随时间变化的生存获益情况。

The changing survival benefits of coronary revascularization over time.

作者信息

Pryor D B, Harrell F E, Rankin J S, Lee K L, Muhlbaier L H, Oldham H N, Hlatky M A, Mark D B, Reves J G, Califf R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 27710.

出版信息

Circulation. 1987 Nov;76(5 Pt 2):V13-21.

PMID:3499256
Abstract

Previous comparisons of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease were performed in the 1970s and may need to be updated to reflect current treatment efficacy. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact on long-term patient survival of changes over time in medical and surgical therapy. Among 5125 patients referred for catheterization between 1969 and 1984, 2261 underwent surgery, and 2864 received medical therapy. Survival in both medically and surgically treated patients improved over time. The improvement in medical patients was due to less sick patients being treated (a decreasing baseline risk), while that observed in surgical patients was due to refinements in care. The rate of improvement in survival over time was much greater in surgical patients, and the difference as compared with medical therapy was highly significant (treatment interaction with time p less than .0001). Estimates of 5 year survival adjusted for baseline risk factors for a patient in 1977 with one-, two-, or three-vessel disease and an ejection fraction of 0.40 were 0.88, 0.80, and 0.64 in medically treated, and 0.88, 0.87, and 0.80 in surgically treated patients. Corresponding projected estimates for 1984 were unchanged for medical patients but improved for surgical patients (0.93, 0.92, and 0.90). Thus, the projected survival benefits of surgery in 1984 appear more significant for all categories of coronary artery disease because of a differential improvement in surgical therapy. These data are relevant to therapeutic decision making for current patients and emphasize the importance of continued analysis of this topic as treatment efficacies change over time.

摘要

先前对冠状动脉疾病的药物治疗和手术治疗的比较是在20世纪70年代进行的,可能需要更新以反映当前的治疗效果。本研究的目的是确定药物治疗和手术治疗随时间的变化对患者长期生存的影响。在1969年至1984年间转诊进行导管插入术的5125例患者中,2261例接受了手术治疗,2864例接受了药物治疗。药物治疗和手术治疗患者的生存率均随时间提高。药物治疗患者生存率的提高是由于接受治疗的病情较轻的患者减少(基线风险降低),而手术治疗患者生存率的提高则是由于治疗的改进。手术患者生存率随时间的提高率要大得多,与药物治疗相比差异非常显著(治疗与时间的交互作用p<0.0001)。1977年,一名患有单支、双支或三支血管疾病且射血分数为0.40的患者,根据基线风险因素调整后的5年生存率估计值,药物治疗患者分别为0.88、0.80和0.64,手术治疗患者分别为0.88、0.87和0.80。1984年相应的预测估计值,药物治疗患者不变,但手术治疗患者有所改善(0.93、0.92和0.90)。因此,由于手术治疗的差异改善,1984年手术治疗对所有类型冠状动脉疾病的预测生存益处似乎更为显著。这些数据与当前患者的治疗决策相关,并强调随着治疗效果随时间变化,持续分析该主题的重要性。

相似文献

1
The changing survival benefits of coronary revascularization over time.冠状动脉血运重建随时间变化的生存获益情况。
Circulation. 1987 Nov;76(5 Pt 2):V13-21.
2
Observational comparison of event-free survival with medical and surgical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. 20 years of follow-up.冠心病患者接受药物治疗和手术治疗的无事件生存率的观察性比较。20年随访。
Circulation. 1992 Nov;86(5 Suppl):II198-204.
3
Changing efficacy of coronary revascularization. Implications for patient selection.冠状动脉血运重建疗效的变化。对患者选择的影响。
Circulation. 1988 Sep;78(3 Pt 2):I185-91.
4
Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery. Eight years follow-up and survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction.
Circulation. 1985 Dec;72(6 Pt 2):V102-9.
5
Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with chronic angina pectoris: implications of the multicenter randomized trials.
Circulation. 1985 Dec;72(6 Pt 2):V23-30.
6
Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery.冠状动脉成形术与再次冠状动脉旁路移植术用于曾接受旁路手术的患者
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00286-0.
7
The effect of clinical characteristics on the comparison of medical and surgical therapy in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and the Veterans Administration Cooperative trial.
Circulation. 1985 Dec;72(6 Pt 2):V117-22.
8
The impact of peripheral vascular disease on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.外周血管疾病对冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.024.
9
Survival, myocardial infarction, and employment status in a prospective randomized study of coronary bypass surgery.
Circulation. 1985 Dec;72(6 Pt 2):V90-101.
10
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Twenty-year clinical outcome.冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术。20年临床结果。
Eur Heart J. 2002 Apr;23(7):543-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2821.

引用本文的文献

1
Is diabetes mellitus a major risk factor in coronary artery bypass grafting? The influence of internal thoracic artery grafting on late survival in diabetic patients.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;48(6):344-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03218154.
2
Assessing providers of coronary revascularization: a method for peer review organizations.评估冠状动脉血运重建治疗服务提供者:一种适用于同行评审组织的方法。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Dec;82(12):1631-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.12.1631.