Goyal Surekha, Tiwari Richa, Narayanan Geeta S, Narayanan Soumya S
Radiation Oncology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, India.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021 Dec 30;26(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0125. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this study was to compare four 3D conformal radiation techniques in treatment of left breast cancer patients.
Radiation was planned for 20 patients to the left breast and regional lymph nodes using four techniques: partially wide tangents, photon-photon mix, photon-electron mix and 30/70 photon-electron mix. All plans were evaluated for internal mammary nodes (IMN) coverage, hotspot and normal tissue constraints.
The 85% of planning target volume (PTV) coverage was lesser for upper IMN than the lower IMN (below the lower border of the clavicular head) for all four techniques. The lower IMN coverage was better for partially wide tangent (80.46%) and photon-photon mix (88.88%). The lowest value of hotspot was seen in the partially wide tangent technique (112.69% ± 1.92). Hotspot is unacceptably high in both photon-electron mix and 30/70 photon-electron mix (> 120%). Left lung mean dose for all techniques on a pair-wise comparison showed no statistical difference. Left lung V20 values for partially wide tangent was 37.56% ± 8.17 and for photon-photon mix it was 40.49% ± 3.36. The mean heart dose with partially wide tangent was 9.43 ± 3.15 Gy and with photon-photon mix it was 10.10 ± 2.70 Gy. The mean heart dose for photon-electron mix was 7.56 ± 1.95 Gy and for 30/70 photon-electron mix it was 7.98 ± 2.16 Gy.
No single technique satisfies all the criteria. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the anatomy of the patient, availability of electron facilities and setup accuracy and reproducibility.
本研究的目的是比较四种三维适形放射技术在治疗左乳腺癌患者中的应用。
使用四种技术为20例左乳腺及区域淋巴结患者制定放疗计划:部分宽切线、光子-光子混合、光子-电子混合和30/70光子-电子混合。对所有计划进行内乳淋巴结(IMN)覆盖、热点和正常组织限制评估。
对于所有四种技术,上内乳淋巴结的计划靶体积(PTV)85%覆盖低于下内乳淋巴结(锁骨头下缘以下)。部分宽切线(80.46%)和光子-光子混合(88.88%)的下内乳淋巴结覆盖较好。热点值最低的是部分宽切线技术(112.69%±1.92)。光子-电子混合和30/70光子-电子混合中的热点均过高(>120%)。两两比较时,所有技术的左肺平均剂量无统计学差异。部分宽切线的左肺V20值为37.56%±8.17,光子-光子混合为40.49%±3.36。部分宽切线的平均心脏剂量为9.43±3.15 Gy,光子-光子混合为10.10±2.70 Gy。光子-电子混合的平均心脏剂量为7.56±1.95 Gy,30/70光子-电子混合为7.98±2.16 Gy。
没有单一技术能满足所有标准。应根据具体情况,考虑患者的解剖结构、电子设备的可用性以及设置的准确性和可重复性来做出决定。