Psychology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;61(3):924-939. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12519. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
People have multiple opportunities to act prosocial any given day but only limited resources to do so (e.g. time, effort and money they are willing to invest). We test whether people prefer to diversify their prosocial efforts across different types of help: casual help, direct help, indirect help and emotional support. In two daily diary studies (total N = 711), we examine whether previous prosocial behaviour affects subsequent prosocial behaviour for the same or other types of prosocial behaviour. We found that day-to-day prosocial behaviours reflected a diversified helping pattern. Participants were less likely to help the same way (i.e. the same type of prosocial behaviour) on subsequent days and more likely to help in different ways (i.e. a different type of prosocial behaviour). This tendency did not extend to casual help in Study 2, implying that the next day reduction in doing the same type of prosocial behaviour is limited to prosocial behaviours that are at least somewhat effortful or time consuming.
人们在每一天都有多次机会表现出亲社会行为,但他们只有有限的资源来这样做(例如,他们愿意投入的时间、精力和金钱)。我们测试了人们是否更愿意将他们的亲社会努力分散到不同类型的帮助中:偶然的帮助、直接的帮助、间接的帮助和情感支持。在两项日常日记研究(总 N=711)中,我们考察了先前的亲社会行为是否会影响随后的同一或其他类型的亲社会行为。我们发现,日常的亲社会行为反映了一种多样化的帮助模式。参与者不太可能在随后的日子里以同样的方式(即同一种亲社会行为)提供帮助,而更有可能以不同的方式(即不同类型的亲社会行为)提供帮助。这种趋势在研究 2 中并没有扩展到偶然帮助,这意味着第二天减少做同一种亲社会行为的趋势仅限于至少有些费力或耗时的亲社会行为。