• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生与工程师沟通的陷阱以及内部工程师培训在眼眶重建个性化植入物数字规划过程中的作用。

Pitfalls of Surgeon-Engineer Communication and the Effect of In-House Engineer Training During Digital Planning of Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Reconstruction.

作者信息

Korn Philippe, Jehn Philipp, Nejati-Rad Narin, Winterboer Jan, Gellrich Nils-Claudius, Spalthoff Simon

机构信息

Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;80(4):676-681. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.003
PMID:34995487
Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of patient-specific implants for reconstruction of complex orbital floor defects is increasing and requires communication with an industry partner, which warrants investigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of in-house training of engineers on such communication as well as to identify frequent sources of problems and their solutions for improvement of the implant-planning workflow.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study and enrolled a sample of patients who had undergone orbital reconstruction with patient-specific implants between 2017 and 2020. The predictor variables were in-house training (additional training completed in hospital or not) and implant complexity (complex [multiwalled implants] vs less complex [isolated orbital floor reconstructions]). The outcome variables were duration of communication, message length, and need for synchronous communication or modifications to the original design. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were computed, and statistical significance was set at a P value of < 0.05.

RESULTS

This study included the data of 66 patients (48 men and 18 women, average age: 42.27 years). The complexity of the implant statistically significantly increased the duration of the communication (8.76 vs 16.03 days; P = .004). In 72.73%, the initial design had to be changed. Engineers trained in house required less communication to plan less-complex implants and generally needed fewer corrections to the original design (P = .020 and P = .036, respectively). Problems during planning were observed in 25.76% of the cases, with an insufficient diagnostic 3-dimensional data set being the most common (15.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

In-house training of engineers is time-saving while planning the workflow for patient-specific implants, especially in less-complex cases, given that design changes are not needed often. The high rate of data sets that were insufficient for planning patient-specific implants suggests that diagnostic 3-dimensional data sets should already meet the requirements for such planning.

摘要

目的

使用定制化植入物修复复杂眶底缺损的情况日益增多,这需要与行业合作伙伴进行沟通,值得深入研究。因此,本研究旨在评估对工程师进行内部培训对这种沟通的影响,并找出常见问题来源及其解决方案,以改进植入物规划工作流程。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,纳入了2017年至2020年间接受定制化植入物眶部重建的患者样本。预测变量为内部培训(是否在医院完成额外培训)和植入物复杂性(复杂[多壁植入物]与不太复杂[单纯眶底重建])。结果变量为沟通时长、信息长度以及同步沟通需求或对原始设计的修改需求。计算了描述性、单变量和多变量统计数据,设定统计学显著性为P值<0.05。

结果

本研究纳入了66例患者的数据(48例男性和18例女性,平均年龄:42.27岁)。植入物的复杂性在统计学上显著增加了沟通时长(8.76天对16.03天;P = 0.004)。在72.73%的情况下,初始设计必须更改。接受内部培训的工程师在规划不太复杂的植入物时所需沟通较少,并且通常对原始设计的修正需求也较少(分别为P = 0.020和P = 0.036)。在25.76%的病例中观察到规划过程中存在问题,其中诊断性三维数据集不足最为常见(15.15%)。

结论

对工程师进行内部培训在为定制化植入物规划工作流程时可节省时间,尤其是在不太复杂的病例中,因为通常不需要进行设计更改。用于规划定制化植入物的数据集不足率较高,这表明诊断性三维数据集应已满足此类规划的要求。

相似文献

1
Pitfalls of Surgeon-Engineer Communication and the Effect of In-House Engineer Training During Digital Planning of Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Reconstruction.外科医生与工程师沟通的陷阱以及内部工程师培训在眼眶重建个性化植入物数字规划过程中的作用。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;80(4):676-681. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Time is crucial in malignant tumor cases: Speeding up the process of patient-specific implant creation.时间在恶性肿瘤病例中至关重要:加快定制植入物的制造进程。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 21;12:904343. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904343. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction.个体化眶部重建植入物。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug 1;30(4):230-235. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000808.
4
Custom Interlocking Implants for Primary and Secondary Reconstruction of Large Orbital Floor Defects: Case Series and Description of Workflow.定制可锁合植入物在初次和二次眼眶大面积底壁重建中的应用:病例系列及手术流程描述。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Dec;79(12):2539.e1-2539.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Do Patient-Specific Implants Decrease Complications and Increase Orbital Volume Reconstruction Accuracy in Primary Orbital Fracture Reconstruction?定制植入物能否降低原发性眼眶骨折重建中的并发症并提高眼眶容积重建的准确性?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;80(4):669-675. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Technical Note on Three- and Four-Wall Orbital Reconstructions With Patient-Specific Implants.患者专用植入物的三壁和四壁眼眶重建技术注释。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;33(4):991-996. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008303. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.使用 3D 打印技术生成定制化眶壁重建用眶内植入物模板。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Dec;32(12):1864-1870. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0193-1. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Low-Cost 3D Printing Orbital Implant Templates in Secondary Orbital Reconstructions.二次眼眶重建中低成本3D打印眼眶植入模板
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep/Oct;33(5):376-380. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000884.
9
Technical concept of patient-specific, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene orbital wall implant.患者特异性超高相对分子质量聚乙烯眶壁植入物的技术概念。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;41(4):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.10.007. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
10
Does Integration of Technology and Customization of Implants Produce Better Outcomes in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.技术整合与植入物定制是否能改善创伤性眶部重建的结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jul;82(7):806-819. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.03.031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-specific implants made of 3D printed bioresorbable polymers at the point-of-care: material, technology, and scope of surgical application.即时医疗环境下由3D打印生物可吸收聚合物制成的个性化植入物:材料、技术及手术应用范围
3D Print Med. 2024 Apr 19;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41205-024-00207-0.
2
A Novel Method for Secondary Mandible Reconstruction to Re-Achieve a Native Condyle Position Comprising a New Design for Cutting Guides and New Positioning Devices.一种用于二次下颌骨重建以重新获得原生髁突位置的新方法,包括切割导板和新定位装置的新设计。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):181. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020181.
3
Time is crucial in malignant tumor cases: Speeding up the process of patient-specific implant creation.
时间在恶性肿瘤病例中至关重要:加快定制植入物的制造进程。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 21;12:904343. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904343. eCollection 2022.
4
Personalized Medicine Workflow in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction.创伤后眼眶重建中的个性化医疗流程
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 24;12(9):1366. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091366.