The Christ Hospital Health Network, 2123 Auburn Ave, Ste 138, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03359-9.
To determine the differences in left atrial (LA) function and geometry assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) between transthyretin (ATTR) and immunoglobulin light chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). We performed a retrospective analysis of 54 consecutive patients (68.5% male, mean age 67 ± 11 years) with confirmed CA (24 ATTR, 30 AL) who underwent comprehensive CMR examinations. LA structural and functional assessment including LA volume, LA sphericity index, and LA strain parameters were compared between both subtypes. In addition, 15 age-matched controls were compared to all groups. Patients with ATTR-CA were older (73 ± 9 vs. 62 ± 10 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (83.3% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.036) when compared to AL-CA. No significant difference existed in LA maximum volume and LA sphericity index between ATTR-CA and AL-CA. LA minimum volumes were larger in ATTR-CA when compared with AL-CA. There was a significant difference in LA function with worse strain values in ATTR vs AL: left atrial reservoir [7.4 (6.3-12.8) in ATTR vs. 13.8 (6.90-24.8) in AL, p = 0.017] and booster strains [3.6 (2.6-5.5) in ATTR vs. 5.2 (3.6-12.1) in AL, p = 0.039]. After adjusting for age, LA reservoir remained significantly lower in ATTR-CA compared to AL-CA (p = 0.03), but not LA booster (p = 0.16). We demonstrate novel differences in LA function between ATTR-CA and AL-CA despite similar LA geometry. Our findings of more impaired LA function in ATTR may offer insight into higher AF burden in these patients.
为了确定心脏磁共振(CMR)评估的转甲状腺素(ATTR)和免疫球蛋白轻链(AL)心脏淀粉样变性(CA)之间左心房(LA)功能和几何结构的差异。我们对 54 例连续确诊的 CA 患者(68.5%为男性,平均年龄 67±11 岁)进行了回顾性分析,这些患者均接受了全面的 CMR 检查。比较了两种亚型之间的 LA 结构和功能评估,包括 LA 容积、LA 球形指数和 LA 应变参数。此外,还将 15 名年龄匹配的对照与所有组进行了比较。与 AL-CA 相比,ATTR-CA 患者年龄更大(73±9 岁 vs. 62±10 岁,p<0.001)且更可能为男性(83.3% vs. 56.7%,p=0.036)。与 AL-CA 相比,ATTR-CA 患者的 LA 最大容积和 LA 球形指数无显著差异。与 AL-CA 相比,ATTR-CA 患者的 LA 最小容积更大。与 AL 相比,ATTR 的 LA 功能有明显差异,应变值更差:LA 储备[7.4(6.3-12.8)在 ATTR 中 vs. 13.8(6.90-24.8)在 AL 中,p=0.017]和升压应变[3.6(2.6-5.5)在 ATTR 中 vs. 5.2(3.6-12.1)在 AL 中,p=0.039]。在调整年龄后,ATTR-CA 的 LA 储备仍明显低于 AL-CA(p=0.03),但 LA 升压储备无差异(p=0.16)。尽管 LA 几何形状相似,但我们发现 ATTR-CA 和 AL-CA 之间的 LA 功能存在新的差异。我们发现 ATTR 中 LA 功能受损更严重,这可能为这些患者的更高房颤负担提供了一些见解。