Research School of Population Health, Australian National University.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;50(6):1981-1994. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab080. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality are evident in all high-income countries, and ongoing monitoring is recommended using linked census-mortality data. Using such data, we provide the first estimates of education-related inequalities in cause-specific mortality in Australia, suitable for international comparisons.
We used Australian Census (2016) linked to 13 months of Death Registrations (2016-17). We estimated relative rates (RR) and rate differences (RD, per 100 000 person-years), comparing rates in low (no qualifications) and intermediate (secondary school) with high (tertiary) education for individual causes of death (among those aged 25-84 years) and grouped according to preventability (25-74 years), separately by sex and age group, adjusting for age, using negative binomial regression.
Among 13.9 M people contributing 14 452 732 person-years, 84 743 deaths occurred. All-cause mortality rates among men and women aged 25-84 years with low education were 2.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.61-2.91] and 2.13 (2.01-2.26) times the rates of those with high education, respectively. We observed inequalities in most causes of death in each age-sex group. Among men aged 25-44 years, relative and absolute inequalities were largest for injuries, e.g. transport accidents [RR = 10.1 (5.4-18.7), RD = 21.2 (14.5-27.9)]). Among those aged 45-64 years, inequalities were greatest for chronic diseases, e.g. lung cancer [men RR = 6.6 (4.9-8.9), RD = 57.7 (49.7-65.8)] and ischaemic heart disease [women RR = 5.8 (3.7-9.1), RD = 20.2 (15.8-24.6)], with similar patterns for people aged 65-84 years. When grouped according to preventability, inequalities were large for causes amenable to behaviour change and medical intervention for all ages and causes amenable to injury prevention among young men.
Australian education-related inequalities in mortality are substantial, generally higher than international estimates, and related to preventability. Findings highlight opportunities to reduce them and the potential to improve the health of the population.
在所有高收入国家,都存在与社会经济地位相关的死亡率不平等现象,建议使用人口普查和死亡率数据进行持续监测。利用这些数据,我们提供了澳大利亚第一个与教育相关的特定原因死亡率不平等的估计值,这些数据适合国际比较。
我们使用澳大利亚人口普查(2016 年)与 13 个月的死亡登记(2016-17 年)相关联。我们针对每个死因(年龄在 25-84 岁之间),比较低学历(无学历)和中等学历(中学)与高学历(高等教育)人群的相对比率(RR)和率差(RD,每 100000 人年),并按可预防性(年龄在 25-74 岁之间)分组,按性别和年龄组进行比较,使用负二项回归法调整年龄因素。
在 1390 万人中,有 14452732 人参与了研究,共发生了 84743 例死亡。25-84 岁低学历人群的全因死亡率分别为 2.76(95%置信区间[CI]:2.61-2.91)和 2.13(2.01-2.26),是高学历人群的 2.76 倍和 2.13 倍。我们观察到,在每个年龄-性别组中,大多数死因都存在不平等现象。在 25-44 岁的男性中,伤害原因的相对和绝对不平等最大,例如交通意外[RR=10.1(5.4-18.7),RD=21.2(14.5-27.9)]。在 45-64 岁的人群中,与慢性疾病相关的不平等最大,例如肺癌[男性 RR=6.6(4.9-8.9),RD=57.7(49.7-65.8)]和缺血性心脏病[女性 RR=5.8(3.7-9.1),RD=20.2(15.8-24.6)],65-84 岁的人群也存在类似的模式。按照可预防性分组,所有年龄段的可通过行为改变和医疗干预来预防的病因以及年轻男性的可通过伤害预防来预防的病因的不平等程度都很大。
澳大利亚与教育相关的死亡率不平等现象相当严重,通常高于国际估计值,且与可预防性有关。这些发现突显了减少这些不平等现象的机会以及改善人口健康的潜力。