• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价:头颈部癌症中诊室活检对安全性和等待时间的影响。

A systematic review: impact of in-office biopsy on safety and waiting times in head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2022 Oct;136(10):909-916. doi: 10.1017/S002221512100428X. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1017/S002221512100428X
PMID:35000641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the current literature on the safety and impact of in-office biopsy on cancer waiting times as well as review evidence regarding cost-efficacy and patient satisfaction.

METHOD

A search of Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Prospero, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for papers relevant to this study. Included articles were quality assessed and critically appraised.

RESULTS

Of 19 741 identified studies, 22 articles were included. Lower costs were consistently reported for in-office biopsy compared with operating room biopsy. Four complications requiring intervention were documented. In-office biopsy is highly tolerated, with a procedure abandonment rate of less than 1 per cent. When compared with operating room biopsy, it is associated with significantly reduced time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment initiation. It is linked to improved overall three-year survival.

CONCLUSION

In-office biopsy is a safe procedure that may help certain patients avoid general anaesthetic. It was shown to significantly reduce time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment initiation when compared with operating room biopsy. This may have important implications for oncological outcomes. In-office biopsy requires fewer resources and is likely to be cost-saving five-years following introduction. With high rates of sensitivity and specificity, in-office biopsy should be considered as the first-line procedure to achieve tissue diagnosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估关于门诊活检的安全性和影响的现有文献,评估成本效益和患者满意度方面的证据。

方法

对 Cinahl、Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline、Prospéro、PubMed 和 Web of Science 进行了检索,以获取与本研究相关的论文。纳入的文章进行了质量评估和批判性评价。

结果

在 19741 项已确定的研究中,有 22 篇文章被纳入。与手术室活检相比,门诊活检的成本始终较低。有 4 例需要干预的并发症被记录。门诊活检具有较高的耐受性,其放弃率不到 1%。与手术室活检相比,它与诊断时间和治疗开始时间的显著缩短有关。它与整体三年生存率的提高有关。

结论

门诊活检是一种安全的程序,可以帮助某些患者避免全身麻醉。与手术室活检相比,它显著缩短了诊断时间和治疗开始时间。这可能对肿瘤学结果有重要影响。门诊活检需要较少的资源,并且在引入后五年内可能具有成本效益。具有较高的敏感性和特异性,门诊活检应被视为获得组织诊断的一线程序。

相似文献

1
A systematic review: impact of in-office biopsy on safety and waiting times in head and neck cancer.系统评价:头颈部癌症中诊室活检对安全性和等待时间的影响。
J Laryngol Otol. 2022 Oct;136(10):909-916. doi: 10.1017/S002221512100428X. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
A systematic review on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of office-based laryngeal biopsy.基于办公室的喉活检的疗效、安全性和成本效益的系统评价。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Sep;137(9):946-952. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122001566. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
National survey sampling exercise on current practice in channelled local anaesthetic biopsy in suspected head and neck cancer.全国范围内关于疑似头颈部癌症中通道局部麻醉活检的现行实践情况的抽样调查。
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 Mar;138(3):338-340. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001500. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
4
The effect of local anaesthetic biopsy in head and neck cancer on cancer pathway waiting times.头颈部癌症局部麻醉活检对癌症通路等待时间的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Apr;105(4):331-335. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0014. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced Waiting Time for Head and Neck Cancer Patients due to a Lean Process Redesign.通过精益流程重新设计减少头颈癌患者等待时间的成本效益
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors.比较门诊杯状钳活检与手术室活检治疗喉咽肿瘤的疗效、安全性和成本效益。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):604-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.10.003. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
In-office biopsy of upper airway lesions: safety, tolerance, and effect on time to treatment.上气道病变的门诊活检:安全性、耐受性及对治疗时间的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):919-23. doi: 10.1002/lary.25007. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Comparison of Costs and Outcomes for In-Office and Operating Room Excision of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌门诊切除与手术室切除的成本及结果比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;83(1):78-81. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001744.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy, Safety, and Tolerance of Office-Based Endoscopic Biopsies for Laryngopharyngeal Lesions.评估门诊内镜下喉咽病变活检的准确性、安全性及耐受性。
Laryngoscope. 2025 Sep;135(9):3287-3295. doi: 10.1002/lary.32197. Epub 2025 May 3.