Centre for Continuing Education of the College of Dental Surgeons and Stomatologists of León, Spain, Phone: +34 669198249, e-mail:
Centre for Continuing Education of the College of Dental Surgeons and Stomatologists of León, Spain.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):1041-1047.
The study aimed to retrospectively compare peri-implant bone loss, prosthetic complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after implant-prosthetic treatment on abutments with platform switch or platform match.
Records of patients, who received implant-prosthetic treatment on abutments with/without platform switch in a single dental clinic between November 2015 and November 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Analysis was restricted to the following patient selection criteria: no need for any bone grafting procedures before/during implant placement, and no serious systemic disease. Implants were conventionally loaded with screwed prosthetic restorations after a healing period of 3 months. Crestal bone loss was measured by digital radiography at implant placement and after at least 2 years under functional implant loading conditions. Patient satisfaction was recorded with the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the time of the follow-up examination.
Clinical records of 59 patients were available for analysis. Patients of the study cohort received in total 128 implants with different lengths and diameters according to the manufacturer's specifications. Prosthetic restorations were fixed either on abutments with platform switch (BEGO PS-UNI: = 74; 57.8%) or platform match (BEGO SUB-TEC Universal: = 54; 42.2%). No implant was lost and no failure of prosthetic restoration was recorded during follow-up, except for prosthetic screw loosening in 32 implants (25.0%). Abutment type and location (maxilla vs mandible) had a significant impact on peri-implant bone loss (OR = 3.4; 2.8). A significant reduced rate of bone loss was observed at implant sites, provided with abutments according to the platform switch concept (35.1 vs 64.8%). No significant correlation was recorded between less bone loss and a higher patient satisfaction, while loosening of the prosthetic screw was significantly associated with lower satisfaction scores.
BEGO PS-UNI abutments with a platform switch design revealed significant less crestal bone loss after a mean observation period of 20.8 months.
Abutments with a platform switch design may lead to less peri-implant bone loss. In order to maintain a higher patient satisfaction, clinicians should focus on the quality of the implant-prosthetic connection in screwed restorations.
本研究旨在回顾性比较平台转换和平台匹配基台在种植体-修复体治疗后对种植体周围骨丢失、修复体并发症和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的影响。
对 2015 年 11 月至 2018 年 11 月期间在一家牙科诊所接受种植体-修复体治疗的患者记录进行了回顾性分析。分析仅限于以下患者选择标准:植入物放置前/期间无需进行任何骨移植手术,且无严重的系统性疾病。在 3 个月的愈合期后,常规采用螺丝固位修复体加载种植体。在功能负荷条件下至少 2 年后,通过数字射线照相测量种植体放置时和种植体颈部骨吸收情况。在随访检查时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录患者满意度。
共分析了 59 名患者的临床记录。研究队列的患者共植入了 128 枚根据制造商规格不同长度和直径的种植体。修复体固定于平台转换基台(BEGO PS-UNI: = 74;57.8%)或平台匹配基台(BEGO SUB-TEC Universal: = 54;42.2%)上。除了 32 个种植体(25.0%)出现修复体螺丝松动外,在随访期间未记录到任何种植体丢失或修复体失败。基台类型和位置(上颌 vs 下颌)对种植体周围骨吸收有显著影响(OR = 3.4;2.8)。采用平台转换概念的种植体部位观察到的骨吸收减少率显著降低(35.1% vs 64.8%)。较少的骨吸收与较高的患者满意度之间无显著相关性,而修复体螺丝松动与较低的满意度评分显著相关。
在平均观察期 20.8 个月后,BEGO PS-UNI 具有平台转换设计的基台显著减少了种植体周围的骨吸收。
具有平台转换设计的基台可能会导致较少的种植体周围骨丢失。为了保持较高的患者满意度,临床医生应注重螺丝固位修复体的种植体-修复体连接质量。