Chacon Marco, Raj Anita
Education Studies Department, 8784University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, 8784University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP20793-NP20815. doi: 10.1177/08862605211055075. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
In-school fighting often results in severe punishment and compromised learning outcomes, without adequate consideration of contextual factors or student vulnerabilities. In this study, using a large, nationally representative data sample from the 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey ( = 13677), we assessed associations between a history of bullying victimization (at school and online) and past year fighting at school among U.S. high school students. Multiple regression models were used, adjusting first for demographics, and then for demographics and emotional-behavioral risks (depressive symptoms, alcohol consumption, and sexual violence victimization), for the total sample and then stratified by gender/sex. Both cyberbullying and in-school bullying were significantly associated with past year in-school fighting for the total sample, with associations retained, but marginally attenuated in fully adjusted models (cyberbullying: AOR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.01-1.66 and in-school bullying: AOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.57-2.45). Gender/sex-stratified models demonstrated retained associations for males (cyberbullying: AOR: 1.93; 1.51-2.46 and in-school bullying: AOR: 2.70, 95% CI: 2.18-3.34) and females (cyberbullying: AOR: 1.89; 1.33-2.68 and in-school bullying: AOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.19-2.33) after adjusting for demographics, but only for males after adjusting for demographics and emotional-behavior risk factors (cyberbullying: AOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.07-1.93 and in-school bullying: AOR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.73-2.92). These results demonstrate a significant association between bullying victimization and fighting, which was amplified for male students, and partially explained by social and emotional risks. This suggests that punitive approaches to fighting in school may be resulting in compounded harms for already vulnerable adolescents and that support-oriented approaches emphasizing conflict resolution, social-emotional well-being, positive gender identity development, and bullying prevention may be more appropriate.
校内打架斗殴往往会导致严厉的惩罚和学习成绩下降,却没有充分考虑到具体情境因素或学生的易受伤害性。在本研究中,我们使用了来自2019年青少年风险行为调查的一个具有全国代表性的大型数据样本(n = 13677),评估了美国高中生中受欺凌受害史(在学校和网络上)与过去一年在校打架之间的关联。我们使用了多元回归模型,首先对人口统计学因素进行调整,然后对人口统计学因素和情绪行为风险(抑郁症状、饮酒和性暴力受害情况)进行调整,针对总样本进行分析,然后按性别分层分析。对于总样本而言,网络欺凌和校内欺凌都与过去一年的校内打架显著相关,在完全调整后的模型中这种关联依然存在,但略有减弱(网络欺凌:调整后比值比[AOR]:1.30;95%置信区间[CI]:1.01 - 1.66;校内欺凌:AOR:1.96,95% CI:1.57 - 2.45)。按性别分层的模型显示,在调整人口统计学因素后,男性(网络欺凌:AOR:1.93;95% CI:1.51 - 2.46;校内欺凌:AOR:2.70,95% CI:2.18 - 3.34)和女性(网络欺凌:AOR:1.89;95% CI:1.33 - 2.68;校内欺凌:AOR:1.66,95% CI:1.19 - 2.33)的关联依然存在,但在调整人口统计学因素和情绪行为风险因素后,仅男性的关联依然显著(网络欺凌:AOR:1.43;95% CI:1.07 - 1.93;校内欺凌:AOR:2.25;95% CI:1.73 - 2.92)。这些结果表明欺凌受害与打架之间存在显著关联,这种关联在男学生中更为明显,并且部分可由社会和情绪风险来解释。这表明在学校对打架采取惩罚性措施可能会给本就脆弱的青少年带来更大的伤害,而强调冲突解决、社会情绪健康、积极的性别认同发展和预防欺凌的支持性方法可能更为合适。