Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(sup1):96-101. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1995552.
Bag-valve-mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation have been the mainstay of prehospital airway management for over four decades. Recently, supraglottic device use has risen due to various factors. The combination of bag-valve-mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and supraglottic devices allows for successful airway management in a majority of patients. However, there exists a small portion of patients who are unable to be intubated and cannot be adequately ventilated with either a facemask or a supraglottic airway. These patients require an emergent surgical airway. A surgical airway is an important component of all airway algorithms, and in some cases may be the only viable approach; therefore, it is imperative that EMS agencies that are credentialed to manage airways have the capability to perform surgical airways when appropriate. The National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP) recommends the following for emergency medical services (EMS) agencies that provide advanced airway management.A surgical airway is reasonable in the prehospital setting when the airway cannot be secured by less invasive means.When indicated, a surgical airway should be performed without delay.A surgical airway is not a substitute for other airway management tools and techniques. It should not be the only rescue option available.Success of an open surgical approach using a scalpel is higher than that of percutaneous Seldinger techniques or needle-jet ventilation in the emergency setting.
四十年多来,球囊面罩通气和气管插管一直是院前气道管理的主要手段。由于各种因素,最近使用声门上装置的情况有所增加。球囊面罩通气、气管插管和声门上装置的联合使用可使大多数患者成功进行气道管理。然而,仍有一小部分患者无法插管,无法通过面罩或声门上气道充分通气。这些患者需要紧急手术气道。手术气道是所有气道算法的重要组成部分,在某些情况下可能是唯一可行的方法;因此,有资格管理气道的急救医疗服务机构必须有能力在适当的时候进行手术气道。国家急救医疗服务医师协会(NAEMSP)为提供高级气道管理的急救医疗服务机构提出以下建议:当无法通过非侵入性手段确保气道安全时,在院前环境中进行手术气道是合理的。如有指征,应毫不拖延地进行手术气道。手术气道不是其他气道管理工具和技术的替代品。它不应该是唯一可用的救援选择。在紧急情况下,使用手术刀进行开放式手术方法的成功率高于经皮 Seldinger 技术或针喷通气。