Gulati Harveen K, Mawlong Michael, Agarwal Arushi, Ranee Karen R
Department of Pathology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Department of Microbiology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
J Cytol. 2021 Oct-Dec;38(4):191-197. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_61_20. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) especially abdominal lymph nodal tuberculosis (LNTB) poses a unique diagnostic challenge. The clinical, cytological, and microbiological profiles, especially with respect to the use and role of Auramine -O (AO) stain, are not as well characterized in abdominal LNTB as cervical LNTB and were evaluated in the present comparative study.
This study was conducted in the Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital in Shillong, Meghalaya in 540 clinical suspected cases of tuberculosis who underwent FNAC. The smears were submitted for Leishman's stain for cytological analysis, along with ZN and Auramine O stain for demonstration of the organism, analyzed, and scored and the results were compared with culture wherever available. The results from abdominal and cervical lymph nodal tuberculosis were compared using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software.
Out of 540 cases, most were tuberculosis (266) followed by reactive lymphadenitis (162), malignancy, and acute necrotizing lesion. On comparing, abdominal lymph nodes ( = 163) were more likely to reveal cheesy/purulent material macroscopically, necrotizing lymphadenitis along with ZN stain and Auramine positivity ( < 0.05) while cervical lymph nodes ( = 66) revealed a higher proportion of granulomatous lymphadenitis and culture positivity ( < 0.05). The sensitivity, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of AO stain (85.9%, 48.0%, and 62.3%) were higher as compared to ZN stain (47.4%, 39.3%, and 51.9%) with culture as the gold standard. The combined sensitivity of Ziehl Neelsen stain and Auramine stain was 92.05%.
Cytological and microbiologic features of abdominal LNTB differ from cervical LNTB. Moreover, AO stain increases the smear positivity, is almost twice as sensitive as ZN stain and should be used as an adjunct in cytological material wherever available.
肺外结核(EPTB)尤其是腹部淋巴结结核(LNTB)带来了独特的诊断挑战。腹部LNTB的临床、细胞学和微生物学特征,尤其是关于金胺 - O(AO)染色的应用和作用,不如颈部LNTB那样得到充分描述,本比较研究对其进行了评估。
本研究在梅加拉亚邦西隆市一家三级护理医院的病理科进行,纳入540例临床疑似结核病且接受细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAC)的病例。涂片送检进行利什曼染色以进行细胞学分析,同时进行抗酸染色(ZN)和金胺O染色以显示病原体,进行分析、评分,并将结果与可获得的培养结果进行比较。使用Microsoft Excel和SPSS软件对腹部和颈部淋巴结结核的结果进行比较。
在540例病例中,大多数为结核病(266例),其次是反应性淋巴结炎(162例)、恶性肿瘤和急性坏死性病变。比较发现,腹部淋巴结(n = 163)在宏观上更有可能显示干酪样/脓性物质、坏死性淋巴结炎以及ZN染色和金胺阳性(P < 0.05),而颈部淋巴结(n = 66)显示肉芽肿性淋巴结炎和培养阳性的比例更高(P < 0.05)。以培养为金标准,AO染色的敏感性、阴性预测值和诊断准确性(分别为85.9%、48.0%和62.3%)高于ZN染色(分别为47.4%、39.3%和51.9%)。抗酸染色(ZN)和金胺染色的联合敏感性为92.05%。
腹部LNTB的细胞学和微生物学特征与颈部LNTB不同。此外,AO染色可提高涂片阳性率,其敏感性几乎是ZN染色的两倍,应在可获得的细胞学材料中作为辅助手段使用。