• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奈必洛尔片剂量准确性的片剂分割技术比较:手工分割与片剂切割器和刀具分割。

Comparison of tablet splitting techniques for dosing accuracy of nebivolol tablets: Hand splitting versus tablet cutter and knife.

作者信息

Olgac Seval, Yilmaz Usta Duygu, Incecayir Tuba

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Etiler 06330, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Dec;29(12):1486-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2021.11.005
PMID:35002386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8720793/
Abstract

Tablet splitting is a common practice in clinical settings to lower doses, facilitate swallowing or save costs. Splitting devices can be used when hand splitting is difficult or painful. However, data on the accuracy of tablet splitting are limited and it presents a number of patient or formulation-related problems. Thirty nebivolol IR tablets on the Turkish market were split by hand, a tablet cutter (Rabır®) or a knife, and tested for weight variation, loss of mass, disintegration, and friability. The accuracy of split tablets was in the range of 75.4-121, 82.4-115, and 86.9-115% when split by hand, the cutter, and knife, respectively. No significant difference in accuracy was determined between the left and right sides split by the cutter (p = 0.222). The differences were significant for hand and knife splittings (p < 0.005). The precision was 9.02, 7.87, and 6.11% (CV%) for hand, tablet cutter, and knife, respectively. Only hand splitting failed to comply with the subdivision test of European Pharmacopoeia. The split portions met USP standards for friability (<1%). Splitting decreased the disintegration time (4.5 vs. 2.2 min). Overall, the accuracy of the tablet cutter was more favorable than hand splitting and knife. The study demonstrated that the splitting technique may result in inaccurate dosing and significant drug fluctuations for nebivolol tablets.

摘要

片剂分割是临床中降低剂量、便于吞咽或节省成本的常见做法。当手工分割困难或疼痛时,可使用分割装置。然而,关于片剂分割准确性的数据有限,并且它存在一些与患者或制剂相关的问题。对土耳其市场上的30片奈必洛尔速释片用手、片剂切割器(Rabır®)或刀进行分割,并测试其重量差异、质量损失、崩解和脆碎度。用手、切割器和刀分割时,分割片剂的准确性分别在75.4 - 121%、82.4 - 115%和86.9 - 115%范围内。切割器分割的左右两侧在准确性上没有显著差异(p = 0.222)。手工和用刀分割的差异显著(p < 0.005)。手工、片剂切割器和刀分割的精密度分别为9.02%、7.87%和6.11%(变异系数)。只有手工分割不符合欧洲药典的细分测试。分割后的部分符合美国药典的脆碎度标准(<1%)。分割缩短了崩解时间(4.5分钟对2.2分钟)。总体而言,片剂切割器的准确性比手工分割和用刀分割更有利。该研究表明,分割技术可能导致奈必洛尔片剂的剂量不准确和显著的药物波动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/8720793/9cfc6e251e8b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/8720793/dbd43044ae26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/8720793/9cfc6e251e8b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/8720793/dbd43044ae26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/8720793/9cfc6e251e8b/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of tablet splitting techniques for dosing accuracy of nebivolol tablets: Hand splitting versus tablet cutter and knife.奈必洛尔片剂量准确性的片剂分割技术比较:手工分割与片剂切割器和刀具分割。
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Dec;29(12):1486-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Accuracy of tablet splitting: Comparison study between hand splitting and tablet cutter.片剂分切的准确性:手工分切与片剂切刀的对比研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Nov;22(5):454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.12.014. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
3
Evaluation of Certain Pharmaceutical Quality Attributes of Lisinopril Split Tablets.赖诺普利分散片某些药学质量属性的评价
Sci Pharm. 2016 Oct 11;84(4):646-653. doi: 10.3390/scipharm84040646.
4
The accuracy, precision and sustainability of different techniques for tablet subdivision: breaking by hand and the use of tablet splitters or a kitchen knife.不同片剂分割技术的准确性、精密度和可持续性:手工掰开和使用片剂分割器或厨房刀。
Int J Pharm. 2014 May 15;466(1-2):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.031. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
5
Effect of different splitting techniques on the characteristics of divided tablets of five commonly split drug products in Jordan.不同分割技术对约旦五种常用可分割药品分割片特性的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Apr-Jun;18(2):1776. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.2.1776. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
6
Tablet Splitting in Elderly Patients with Dementia: The Case of Quetiapine.老年痴呆患者的片剂分割:喹硫平案例
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Sep 20;13(9):1523. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091523.
7
Dose Uniformity of Scored and Unscored Tablets: Application of the FDA Tablet Scoring Guidance for Industry.刻痕片与无刻痕片的剂量均匀性:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)行业片剂刻痕指南的应用
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2016;70(6):523-532. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006411.
8
Tablet splitting: is it worthwhile? Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half tablets of 16 commonly used medications in the outpatient setting.片剂掰开:是否值得?对门诊环境下 16 种常用药物半片的药物含量和重量均匀度的分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jan;21(1):76-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.1.76.
9
Evaluation of the Discrepancy between the European Pharmacopoeia Test and an Adopted United States Pharmacopoeia Test Regarding the Weight Uniformity of Scored Tablet Halves: Is Harmonization Required?欧洲药典测试与采用的美国药典测试在刻痕片半片重量均匀度方面的差异评估:是否需要协调统一?
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):20-7. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2012.00791.
10
Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half-tablets of 6 commonly split medications.6种常见可分割药物半片的药物含量及重量均匀度分析
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Apr;15(3):253-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.3.253.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Efficacy of Warfarin Sodium Tablet Subdivided by 3D Printing Technology: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients After Prosthetic Valve Replacement.3D打印技术细分华法林钠片的特征与疗效:人工瓣膜置换术后患者的回顾性队列研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Jul 16;19:6089-6109. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S525232. eCollection 2025.
2
Formulation, optimization and evaluation of ocular gel containing nebivolol Hcl-loaded ultradeformable spanlastics nanovesicles: In vitro and in vivo studies.含盐酸奈必洛尔的超变形Spanlastics纳米囊泡眼用凝胶的制剂、优化及评价:体外和体内研究
Int J Pharm X. 2024 Jan 16;7:100228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100228. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tablet Splitting in Elderly Patients with Dementia: The Case of Quetiapine.老年痴呆患者的片剂分割:喹硫平案例
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Sep 20;13(9):1523. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091523.
2
Heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study.基层医疗中的心衰流行病学与治疗:一项回顾性横断面研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):489-497. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13105. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
3
Effect of different splitting techniques on the characteristics of divided tablets of five commonly split drug products in Jordan.
The Risks of Patient Pill Splitting: A Case Report and Review.
患者掰药的风险:一例病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 10;15(11):e48610. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48610. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Practical Application of 3D Printing for Pharmaceuticals in Hospitals and Pharmacies.3D打印技术在医院和药房药品领域的实际应用
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jul 4;15(7):1877. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071877.
不同分割技术对约旦五种常用可分割药品分割片特性的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Apr-Jun;18(2):1776. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.2.1776. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
The development of a test battery to assess the hand-eye functions relevant in predicting easy and accurate tablet subdivision in older people: A pilot study.开发一套测试组合以评估与预测老年人轻松准确地分割平板电脑相关的手眼功能:一项初步研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(10):1969-1981. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14201. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
Does splitting a tablet obtain the accurate dose?: A systematic review protocol.掰开片剂能获得准确剂量吗?:一项系统评价方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(42):e17189. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017189.
6
Methodologies for assessing the acceptability of oral formulations among children and older adults: a systematic review.评估儿童和老年人对口服制剂接受度的方法学:系统评价。
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Apr;23(4):830-847. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.038. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Pharmaceutical counselling about different types of tablet-splitting methods based on the results of weighing tests and mechanical development of splitting devices.基于称重测试结果和分割装置的机械研发,提供关于不同类型片剂分割方法的药学咨询。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Aug 30;106:262-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Accuracy of tablet splitting and liquid measurements: an examination of who, what and how.片剂分割和液体测量的准确性:对何人、何物及如何操作的考察。
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017 May;69(5):603-612. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12671. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Key Technical Aspects Influencing the Accuracy of Tablet Subdivision.影响片剂分割准确性的关键技术因素
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 May;18(4):1393-1401. doi: 10.1208/s12249-016-0615-y. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
10
Relationship between Age and the Ability to Break Scored Tablets.年龄与掰开刻痕片剂能力之间的关系
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Jul 26;7:222. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00222. eCollection 2016.