Plater Emma B, Seto Vivian S, Peters Ryan M, Bent Leah R
Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 22;15:789271. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.789271. eCollection 2021.
Foot sole skin interfaces with the ground and contributes to successful balance. In situations with reduced sensitivity in the glabrous foot skin, stochastic resonance (SR) improves skin sensitivity by adding tactile noise. Some situations, however, involve an interface comprised of hairy skin, which has higher thresholds for sensitivity. For example, in lower extremity amputation the residual limb is comprised of hairy leg skin. The main objective of this study was to determine if SR improves skin sensitivity in hairy skin, and whether a specific intensity of noise is most effective. Secondary objectives were to compare the effect between locations, ages and modalities. In 60 healthy participants a vibrotactile (test) input was delivered at the lower extremity concurrently with a second, noisy stimulus applied more proximally. The presence of a remote SR effect was tested in 15 young participants using electrotactile noise at the calf. Secondary objectives were tested in separate groups of 15 subjects and differed by substituting for one of the three variables: vibrotactile noise, heel site, and with older participants. A forced-choice protocol was used to determine detection ability of the subthreshold vibration test input with varying noise levels applied simultaneously (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of perceptual threshold). An SR effect was identified when increased detection of the input was obtained at any level of noise versus no noise. It was found that all four test groups demonstrated evidence of SR: 33-47% of individuals showed better detection of the input with added noise. The SR effect did not appear consistently at any specific noise level for any of the groups, and none of the variables showed a superior ability to evoke SR. Interestingly, in approximately 33% of cases, threshold values fluctuated throughout testing. While this work has provided evidence that SR can enhance the perception of a vibrotactile input in hairy skin, these data suggest that the ability to repeatably show an SR effect relies on maintaining a consistent threshold.
足底皮肤与地面接触,有助于实现成功的平衡。在无毛足皮肤敏感性降低的情况下,随机共振(SR)通过添加触觉噪声来提高皮肤敏感性。然而,有些情况涉及由多毛皮肤组成的界面,其敏感性阈值较高。例如,在下肢截肢中,残肢由多毛的腿部皮肤组成。本研究的主要目的是确定随机共振是否能提高多毛皮肤的敏感性,以及特定强度的噪声是否最有效。次要目的是比较不同位置、年龄和模态之间的效果。在60名健康参与者中,在下肢同时给予振动触觉(测试)输入,并在更靠近近端的位置施加第二个有噪声的刺激。在15名年轻参与者中,使用小腿处的电触觉噪声测试远程随机共振效应。次要目的在15名受试者的单独组中进行测试,通过替换三个变量之一来区分:振动触觉噪声、足跟部位和老年参与者。采用强制选择方案来确定在同时施加不同噪声水平(0、20、40、60、80和100%的感知阈值)时,阈下振动测试输入的检测能力。当在任何噪声水平下与无噪声相比,输入检测增加时,确定存在随机共振效应。结果发现,所有四个测试组均显示出随机共振的证据:33%-47%的个体在添加噪声后对输入的检测更好。随机共振效应在任何组的任何特定噪声水平下均未一致出现,且没有一个变量显示出诱发随机共振的卓越能力。有趣的是,在大约33%的情况下,阈值在整个测试过程中波动。虽然这项工作提供了证据表明随机共振可以增强对多毛皮肤中振动触觉输入的感知,但这些数据表明,可重复显示随机共振效应的能力依赖于维持一致的阈值。