Siehler Oliver, Wang Shuo, Bloch Guy
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Front Physiol. 2021 Dec 23;12:789773. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.789773. eCollection 2021.
Honey bees live in colonies containing tens of thousands of workers that coordinate their activities to produce efficient colony-level behavior. In free-foraging colonies, nest bees are entrained to the forager daily phase of activity even when experiencing conflicting light-dark illumination regime, but little is known on the cues mediating this potent social synchronization. We monitored locomotor activity in an array of individually caged bees in which we manipulated the contact with neighbour bees. We used circular statistics and coupling function analyses to estimate the degree of social synchronization. We found that young bees in cages connected to cages housing foragers showed stronger rhythms, better synchronization with each other, higher coupling strength, and a phase more similar to that of the foragers compared to similar bees in unconnected cages. These findings suggest that close distance contacts are sufficient for social synchronization or that cage connection facilitated the propagation of time-giving social cues. Coupling strength was higher for bees placed on the same tray compared with bees at a similar distance but on a different tray, consistent with the hypothesis that substrate borne vibrations mediate phase synchronization. Additional manipulation of the contact between cages showed that social synchronization is better among bees in cages connected with tube with a single mesh partition compared to sealed tubes consistent with the notion that volatile cues act additively to substrate borne vibrations. These findings are consistent with self-organization models for social synchronization of activity rhythms and suggest that the circadian system of honey bees evolved remarkable sensitivity to non-photic, non-thermal, time giving entraining cues enabling them to tightly coordinate their behavior in the dark and constant physical environment of their nests.
蜜蜂生活在由成千上万只工蜂组成的群体中,这些工蜂协调它们的活动以产生高效的群体水平行为。在自由觅食的蜂群中,即使经历相互冲突的明暗光照模式,巢内蜜蜂也会被调节到觅食者的日常活动阶段,但对于介导这种强大的社会同步的线索却知之甚少。我们监测了一系列单独关在笼子里的蜜蜂的运动活动,在这些笼子里我们控制了与相邻蜜蜂的接触。我们使用圆形统计和耦合函数分析来估计社会同步的程度。我们发现,与未连接笼子里的类似蜜蜂相比,连接到装有觅食者笼子的笼子里的幼蜂表现出更强的节律、彼此之间更好的同步性、更高的耦合强度以及与觅食者更相似的相位。这些发现表明近距离接触足以实现社会同步,或者笼子连接促进了给予时间的社会线索的传播。与处于相似距离但在不同托盘上的蜜蜂相比,放在同一托盘上的蜜蜂耦合强度更高,这与底物传播振动介导相位同步的假设一致。对笼子之间接触的进一步操作表明,与密封管相比,用带有单个网眼隔板的管子连接的笼子里的蜜蜂之间的社会同步性更好,这与挥发性线索对底物传播振动起累加作用的观点一致。这些发现与活动节律社会同步的自组织模型一致,并表明蜜蜂的昼夜节律系统对非光、非热、给予时间的同步线索具有显著的敏感性,使它们能够在巢穴黑暗且物理环境恒定的情况下紧密协调其行为。