• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲和力与专家说服力:缺乏亲和力会降低专家证据的说服力。

Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence.

作者信息

Younan Mariam, Martire Kristy A

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:785677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677
PMID:35002877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8734643/
Abstract

With the use of expert evidence increasing in civil and criminal trials, there is concern jurors' decisions are affected by factors that are irrelevant to the quality of the expert opinion. Past research suggests that the likeability of an expert significantly affects juror attributions of credibility and merit. However, we know little about the effects of expert likeability when detailed information about expertise is provided. Two studies examined the effect of an expert's likeability on the persuasiveness judgments and sentencing decisions of 456 jury-eligible respondents. Participants viewed and/or read an expert's testimony (lower vs. higher quality) before rating expert persuasiveness (via credibility, value, and weight), and making a sentencing decision in a Capitol murder case (death penalty vs. life in prison). Lower quality evidence was significantly less persuasive than higher quality evidence. Less likeable experts were also significantly less persuasive than either neutral or more likeable experts. This "penalty" for less likeable experts was observed irrespective of evidence quality. However, only perceptions of the foundational validity of the expert's discipline, the expert's trustworthiness and the clarity and conservativeness of the expert opinion significantly predicted sentencing decisions. Thus, the present study demonstrates that while likeability does influence persuasiveness, it does not necessarily affect sentencing outcomes.

摘要

随着专家证据在民事和刑事审判中的使用日益增加,人们担心陪审员的决定会受到与专家意见质量无关的因素影响。过去的研究表明,专家的亲和力会显著影响陪审员对可信度和价值的判断。然而,当提供关于专业知识的详细信息时,我们对专家亲和力的影响知之甚少。两项研究考察了专家亲和力对456名符合陪审员资格的受访者的说服力判断和量刑决定的影响。参与者在对专家的说服力(通过可信度、价值和权重)进行评分,并在一个国会山谋杀案中做出量刑决定(死刑与终身监禁)之前,观看和/或阅读了专家的证词(质量较低与较高)。质量较低的证据明显不如质量较高的证据有说服力。不太有亲和力的专家也明显不如中立或更有亲和力的专家有说服力。无论证据质量如何,都观察到了对不太有亲和力的专家的这种“惩罚”。然而,只有对专家学科的基本有效性、专家的可信度以及专家意见的清晰度和保守性的看法能显著预测量刑决定。因此,本研究表明,虽然亲和力确实会影响说服力,但不一定会影响量刑结果。

相似文献

1
Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence.亲和力与专家说服力:缺乏亲和力会降低专家证据的说服力。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:785677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677. eCollection 2021.
2
Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?法庭上的可信度:专家证人应该有多讨人喜欢?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):525-32.
3
Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?专家证人知识的差异:模拟陪审员会注意到吗?这重要吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Mar;43(1):69-81.
4
Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom.在法庭上呈现临床信息时,男性和女性临床心理学家和精神科医生专家证人的偏见和可信度认知。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 Sep-Oct;96:102016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102016. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
Judging experts: Australian magistrates' evaluations of expert opinion quality.评判专家:澳大利亚治安法官对专家意见质量的评估
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 5;27(6):950-962. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1751334.
6
Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.提高陪审员对法证证言的评估及其对决策和证据评估的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Oct;47(5):566-578. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000539. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.证人席上的热情与能力:对男性和女性专家证人可信度的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(4):488-97.
8
Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.专家证人的可信度与陪审员的个性:它们对法庭上的可信度及说服力的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(1):63-74.
9
Reasoning about scientific evidence: effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case.关于科学证据的推理:陪审员性别和证据质量对职场敌对环境案件中陪审员裁决的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):362-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.362.
10
Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.死刑量刑中的专家证词:陪审员的反应。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(4):509-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural speech tracking in a virtual acoustic environment: audio-visual benefit for unscripted continuous speech.虚拟声学环境中的神经语音跟踪:非脚本连续语音的视听益处
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Apr 9;19:1560558. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1560558. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-determined similarity increases likability and trustworthiness of human voices.人工智能确定的相似度会提高人类声音的亲和力和可信度。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0318890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318890. eCollection 2025.
3
Characteristics and quality assessment of online mentoring profile texts in academic medical mentoring.

本文引用的文献

1
Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis.陪审员对法医专家证词的理解:文献综述与差距分析。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Mar 9;1:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.001. eCollection 2019.
2
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.个体决策与群体决策:陪审员在评估专家证词时对核心信息和边缘信息的依赖
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0183580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183580. eCollection 2017.
3
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Professional Perceptions of Jury Decision-making Research Practices.
学术医学指导中在线指导档案文本的特征和质量评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04804-1.
善、恶与丑:专业人士对陪审团决策研究实践的看法
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Jul;34(4):495-514. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2246. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
5
Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?专家证人知识的差异:模拟陪审员会注意到吗?这重要吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Mar;43(1):69-81.
6
Women as expert witnesses: a review of the literature.女性作为专家证人:文献综述
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Mar-Apr;32(2):164-79. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2113. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
7
Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.证人席上的热情与能力:对男性和女性专家证人可信度的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(4):488-97.
8
Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.法庭科学:陪审员对线粒体 DNA 证据的理解。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Feb;35(1):60-71. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9222-8.
9
The Witness Credibility Scale: an outcome measure for expert witness research.目击证人可信度量表:专家证人研究的结果测量指标。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):892-907. doi: 10.1002/bsl.917. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
10
Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?法庭上的可信度:专家证人应该有多讨人喜欢?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):525-32.