Cramer Robert J, Brodsky Stanley L, DeCoster Jamie
Social Cognition Laboratory, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(1):63-74.
The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between both expert witness confidence and juror personality with expert witness credibility, as well as expert witness credibility with juror sentencing outcome. Participants were presented with one of three randomly assigned filmed scenarios depicting various levels of manipulated witness confidence. They then completed a sentencing outcome item, the Witness Credibility Scale, and the Goldberg Five-Factor Markers. Expert witness confidence had a significant main effect on ratings of credibility, with moderate levels of manipulated confidence yielding the highest credibility. Juror extroversion was positively related to perceptions of expert witness credibility. Finally, juror ratings of expert witness credibility, as well as two subcomponents, predicted juror sentencing outcome.
本研究旨在调查专家证人的自信程度和陪审员个性与专家证人可信度之间的关系,以及专家证人可信度与陪审员量刑结果之间的关系。参与者被随机分配观看三个拍摄场景中的一个,这些场景描绘了不同程度的人为操纵的证人自信程度。然后,他们完成了一个量刑结果项目、证人可信度量表和戈德堡五因素指标。专家证人的自信程度对可信度评级有显著的主效应,适度的人为操纵的自信程度产生最高的可信度。陪审员的外向性与对专家证人可信度的看法呈正相关。最后,陪审员对专家证人可信度的评级以及两个子成分预测了陪审员的量刑结果。