Suppr超能文献

短暂性脑缺血发作患者住院治疗与急诊科治疗结局的比较

Comparing Treatment Outcomes Between In-Hospital and Emergency Department Management of Patients With Transient Ischemic Attacks.

作者信息

Taylor Roger S, Opara Nnennaya U, Burg Joshua

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA.

Emergency Medicine, CAMC Education and Research Institute, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Dec 8;13(12):e20261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20261. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction A transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a medical emergency, as it is a sudden neurological episode caused by ischemia in a vascular territory in the brain, which lasts less than one hour. TIA definition has shifted from time-based to tissue-based according to modern literature. It is considered a warning sign for an impending stroke. Symptoms could range from weakness on one side of the body, diaphoresis, to slurred speech. In this study, we examined the differences in health outcomes, when patients diagnosed with TIA are treated and discharged home from the ED, versus when admitted to the hospital for additional care. Methods This is a descriptive and retrospective study. We examined all patients' encounters from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 at four emergency department locations. The cohort compared patients diagnosed with a TIA who takes medications (anti-lipid, antiplatelet drugs) versus patients diagnosed with a TIA who are not on any preventive medication. We compared the hospital readmission rate between these two group of patients and the need for additional medical treatments. Our study also considered hospital length of stay (LOS), admission rate, and its impact on patients with comorbidities. Results There were 983 patients included in the study. The patients on TIA prophylactic medications prior to coming to the ED made up (60.7%), and (51.2%) in this group required additional medications during hospital admission. The remaining 162 (39.3%), p=0.001 patients, were not on TIA prophylactic medications prior to presenting in the ED. The patients who required additional medications while in the ED were significantly older (mean +/-SD, 68.6 +/-14.0 years versus 62.18 +/- 17.4 years, p=0.001). Following a multivariate analysis, age greater than 60 (CI: 3.52-3.91, p=0.001) and results of the head CT/MRI investigations for any signs of neurological damage, were all found to be independent predictors of longer hospital stay and treatment outcomes. There were no significant differences in the treatment outcome for patients with TIA based on longer hospital stay and extra medication administration in the ED. Conclusion In our study, we observed that approximately, 75% of the patients who were on TIA prophylactic medications prior to presenting in the ED with symptoms of TIA were admitted to the hospital for further monitoring, compared to other group of patients who were not on TIA medications. We did also noted that there were no differences in mortality outcome between patients treated and discharged from the ED, versus patients admitted to the hospital for additional treatment. Lastly, patients who are 68 years and older, made up two-thirds of patient population admitted in the hospital and required additional medications, compared to younger patients.

摘要

引言 短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)是一种医疗急症,因为它是由脑部血管区域缺血引起的突发神经事件,持续时间少于1小时。根据现代文献,TIA的定义已从基于时间转变为基于组织。它被认为是即将发生中风的警示信号。症状范围可从身体一侧无力、出汗到言语不清。在本研究中,我们检查了被诊断为TIA的患者在急诊室接受治疗并出院回家与住院接受进一步治疗时健康结局的差异。

方法 这是一项描述性回顾性研究。我们检查了2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日在四个急诊科地点的所有患者就诊情况。该队列比较了被诊断为TIA且服用药物(抗血脂、抗血小板药物)的患者与未服用任何预防性药物的被诊断为TIA的患者。我们比较了这两组患者的医院再入院率和额外医疗治疗的需求。我们的研究还考虑了住院时间(LOS)、入院率及其对合并症患者的影响。

结果 该研究纳入了983名患者。在来急诊室之前服用TIA预防性药物的患者占(60.7%),该组中(51.2%)的患者在住院期间需要额外用药。其余162名(39.3%),p = 0.001患者在来急诊室之前未服用TIA预防性药物。在急诊室需要额外用药的患者明显年龄更大(平均±标准差,68.6±14.0岁对62.18±17.4岁,p = 0.001)。经过多变量分析,年龄大于60岁(置信区间:3.52 - 3.91,p = 0.001)以及头部CT/MRI检查有无任何神经损伤迹象的结果,均被发现是住院时间延长和治疗结局的独立预测因素。基于在急诊室住院时间延长和额外用药,TIA患者的治疗结局没有显著差异。

结论 在我们的研究中,我们观察到,与其他未服用TIA药物的患者组相比,在出现TIA症状前来急诊室之前服用TIA预防性药物的患者中,约75%被收住院进行进一步监测。我们还注意到,从急诊室接受治疗并出院的患者与住院接受额外治疗的患者之间在死亡率结局上没有差异。最后,68岁及以上的患者占住院患者总数的三分之二,并且与年轻患者相比需要额外用药。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993a/8735838/9f86bfc12c6c/cureus-0013-00000020261-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验