Kong Kristi, Koontz Diane, Morse Christina, Roth Eileen, Domsic Robyn T, Simon Marc A, Stratton Eric, Buchholz Connor, Tobin-Finch Kimberly, Simms Robert, George M Patricia, Hassoun Paul M, Farber Harrison, Lafyatis Robert
Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021 Oct 1;6(3):242-246. doi: 10.1177/23971983211016196. Epub 2021 May 28.
Given the poor treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension associated systemic sclerosis (SSc-PAH) patients, we sought to determine clinical safety and efficacy of Dimethylfumarate (DMF), an Nrf2 agonist, and the effects on biomarkers of oxidative stress on SSc-PAH in an exploratory interventional clinical trial.
The primary objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with DMF in patients with SSc-PAH.
This was an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at two sites in the United States. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and all adverse events (AEs) in DMF compared to placebo-treated patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in 6MWD from baseline to the end of treatment at Week 24 in DMF compared to placebo-treated patients.
Six participants were randomized to either placebo (n = 2) or DMF (n = 4). Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. A total of 25 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 6 subjects, with 14 AEs (56.0%) having occurred in DMF-treated subjects. 3 occurrences were identified as nausea AEs, and two participants withdrew due to nausea. One participant in the placebo group was withdrawn after a hospitalization SAE due to worsening of heart failure and shortness of breath secondary to anemia. One participant in each group completed protocol. Subjects in the DMF-treated group showed a non-significant reduced decline in 6MWD (relative mean change of -7.07%) from baseline to Week 24 as compared to placebo-treated subjects (relative mean change of -14.97%).
Patients treated for SSc-PAH with 2 and 3-drug regimens, as is now typical for these patients, tolerate DMF poorly. Our small samples size did not provide power to suggest efficacy. We suggest that Nrf2 is still a valid therapeutic target for future trials, using better tolerated Nrf2 agonists.
鉴于肺动脉高压相关系统性硬化症(SSc-PAH)患者的治疗选择有限,我们试图在一项探索性干预临床试验中确定Nrf2激动剂富马酸二甲酯(DMF)对SSc-PAH的临床安全性和有效性,以及对氧化应激生物标志物的影响。
主要目的是评估DMF治疗SSc-PAH患者的安全性和有效性。
这是一项由研究者发起的、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,在美国的两个地点进行。主要安全终点是与安慰剂治疗患者相比,DMF治疗患者中严重不良事件(SAE)和所有不良事件(AE)的发生率。主要疗效终点是与安慰剂治疗患者相比,DMF治疗患者在第24周治疗结束时从基线开始的6分钟步行距离(6MWD)变化。
6名参与者被随机分为安慰剂组(n = 2)或DMF组(n = 4)。两组的基线人口统计学特征相似。6名受试者共发生25起不良事件(AE),其中14起(56.0%)发生在DMF治疗的受试者中。3起被确定为恶心不良事件,两名参与者因恶心退出。安慰剂组的一名参与者在因心力衰竭恶化和继发于贫血的呼吸急促住院发生SAE后退出。每组各有一名参与者完成方案。与安慰剂治疗的受试者相比,DMF治疗组的受试者从基线到第24周的6MWD下降不显著(相对平均变化为-7.07%),而安慰剂治疗组为-14.97%。
目前这些患者常用的2药和3药方案治疗SSc-PAH患者时,对DMF耐受性较差。我们的小样本量未能提供表明疗效的统计学效力。我们建议,使用耐受性更好的Nrf2激动剂,Nrf2仍是未来试验的有效治疗靶点。