Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Sports Performance Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Oak Brook, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):814-822. doi: 10.1177/03635465211067824. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
Biomechanical predictors of pitching accuracy are underevaluated in baseball research. It is unclear how pitchers with higher accuracy differ in terms of kinematics and upper extremity kinetics.
To differentiate high- and low-accuracy professional pitchers by full-body kinematic and upper extremity kinetic parameters.
Descriptive laboratory study.
In total, 121 professional baseball pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastballs while assessed with motion-capture technology (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into high-accuracy (n = 33), moderate-accuracy (n = 52), and low-accuracy (n = 36) groups based on the absolute center deviation of each pitcher's average pitch to the center of the pitching chart by greater or less than 0.5 SD from the mean, respectively. The 95% confidence ellipses with comparisons of major and minor radii and pitching probability density grids were constructed. Analysis of variance was used to compare kinematic and kinetic values between groups.
The absolute center deviation (14.5% ± 6.7% vs 33.5% ± 3.7% grid width; < .001) was significantly lower in the high-accuracy compared with the low-accuracy group, with no significant difference in ball velocity (38.0 ± 1.7 vs 38.5 ± 2.0 m/s; = .222). Lead knee flexion at ball release (30.6°± 17.8° vs 40.1°± 16.3°; = .023) was significantly less for the high-accuracy pitchers. Peak normalized shoulder internal rotation torque (5.5% ± 1.0% vs 4.9% ± 0.7% body weight [BW] × body height [BH]; = .008), normalized elbow varus torque (5.4% ± 1.0% vs 4.8% ± 0.7% BW × BH; = .008), and normalized elbow medial force (42.9% ± 7.3% vs 38.6% ± 6.2% BW; = .024) were significantly greater for the low-accuracy group compared with the high-accuracy group.
Professional pitchers with increased accuracy experienced decreased throwing arm kinetics. These pitchers had increased lead knee extension at later stages of the pitch, potentially providing more stable engagement with the ground and transference of kinetic energy to the upper extremities. Professional pitchers can consider increasing lead knee extension at the final stages of the pitch to improve the accuracy of their throws and mitigate elbow varus torque.
Increased elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, and elbow medial force in less accurate pitchers may contribute to increased injury risk in this group.
在棒球研究中,对投球准确性的生物力学预测因素评估不足。目前尚不清楚准确性较高的投手在运动学和上肢动力学方面有何不同。
通过全身运动学和上肢动力学参数来区分高准确性和低准确性的专业投手。
描述性实验室研究。
共有 121 名职业棒球投手以 480Hz 的运动捕捉技术投掷 8 到 12 个快球。根据每位投手的平均投球相对于投球图中心的绝对中心偏差,将投手分为高准确性(n=33)、中准确性(n=52)和低准确性(n=36)组,偏差大于或小于平均值的 0.5 SD。构建了主要和次要半轴的 95%置信椭圆和投球概率密度网格的比较。使用方差分析比较组间运动学和动力学值。
高准确性组的绝对中心偏差(14.5%±6.7% vs 33.5%±3.7%网格宽度;<0.001)明显低于低准确性组,球速无显著差异(38.0±1.7 vs 38.5±2.0 m/s;=0.222)。高准确性投手的投球时的伸膝角度(30.6°±17.8° vs 40.1°±16.3°;=0.023)明显更小。低准确性组的峰值标准化肩内旋扭矩(5.5%±1.0% vs 4.9%±0.7%体重[BW]×身高[BH];=0.008)、标准化肘外翻扭矩(5.4%±1.0% vs 4.8%±0.7% BW×BH;=0.008)和标准化肘内侧力(42.9%±7.3% vs 38.6%±6.2% BW;=0.024)明显更大。
准确性提高的职业投手经历了减少的投掷臂动力学。这些投手在投球的后期阶段伸膝角度更大,这可能为与地面的更稳定接触以及将动能传递到上肢提供了更大的稳定性。职业投手可以考虑在投球的最后阶段增加伸膝角度,以提高投掷的准确性并减轻肘外翻扭矩。
准确性较低的投手中,肘外翻扭矩、肩内旋扭矩和肘内侧力增加,可能会增加该组受伤的风险。