Laboratorio Mecanismos del Dolor, Centro de Investigación, División Académica de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa Tabasco, México.
Behav Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 1;33(1):15-22. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000661.
This study was designed to characterize the type of interaction (subadditive, additive, or synergistic) after simultaneous administration by two different routes (intraperitoneal plus peripheral local) of the same nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) ketorolac and indomethacin or paracetamol. The antinociceptive effects of locally or intraperitoneally delivery of NSAIDs or paracetamol, and the simultaneous administration by the two routes at fixed-dose ratio combination were evaluated using the formalin test. Pain-related behavior was quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw. Isobolographic analysis was used to characterize the interaction between the two routes. ED30 values were estimated for individual drugs, and isobolograms were constructed. Ketorolac, indomethacin, or paracetamol and fixed-dose ratio combinations produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the second but not in the first phase of the formalin test. The analysis of interaction type after simultaneous administration by the two routes the same NSAID or paracetamol (on basis of their ED30), revealed that the simultaneous administration of ketorolac or paracetamol was additive and for indomethacin was synergistic. Since the mechanisms underlying the additive effect of ketorolac or paracetamol and the synergistic effect of indomethacin were not explored; it is possible that the peripheral and central mechanism is occurring at several anatomical sites. The significance of these findings for theory and pain pharmacotherapy practice indicates that the combination of one analgesic drug given simultaneously by two different administration routes could be an additive or it could lead to a synergistic interaction.
本研究旨在描述两种不同途径(腹腔内加外周局部)同时给予相同非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)酮咯酸和吲哚美辛或扑热息痛后相互作用的类型(相加、协同或协同)。通过甲醛试验评估局部或腹腔内给予 NSAID 或扑热息痛,以及以固定剂量比组合同时通过两种途径给药的镇痛效果。将疼痛相关行为量化为注射爪的抽搐次数。使用等辐射分析来描述两种途径之间的相互作用。估计了个体药物的 ED30 值,并构建了等辐射图。酮咯酸、吲哚美辛或扑热息痛和固定剂量比组合在甲醛试验的第二阶段而不是第一阶段产生了剂量依赖性镇痛作用。对两种途径同时给予相同 NSAID 或扑热息痛(基于其 ED30)后的相互作用类型进行分析,结果表明酮咯酸或扑热息痛的同时给药是相加的,而吲哚美辛的同时给药是协同的。由于未探讨酮咯酸或扑热息痛相加作用和吲哚美辛协同作用的机制;可能存在外周和中枢机制发生在几个解剖部位。这些发现对理论和疼痛药物治疗实践的意义表明,同时通过两种不同给药途径给予一种镇痛药物的组合可能是相加的,也可能导致协同相互作用。