• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SARC-F评分对胃肠道晚期癌症的预后影响

Prognostic Impact of the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Advanced Cancers.

作者信息

Matsui Masahiro, Nishikawa Hiroki, Goto Masahiro, Asai Akira, Ushiro Kosuke, Ogura Takeshi, Takeuchi Toshihisa, Nakamura Shiro, Kakimoto Kazuki, Miyazaki Takako, Fukunishi Shinya, Ohama Hideko, Yokohama Keisuke, Yasuoka Hidetaka, Higuchi Kazuhide

机构信息

The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki 569-8686, Japan.

The Premier Departmental Research of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki 569-8686, Japan.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;14(1):10. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010010.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14010010
PMID:35008175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8749778/
Abstract

We sought to elucidate the prognostic impact of the SARC-F score among patients with gastrointestinal advanced malignancies ( = 421). A SARC-F score ≥ 4 was judged to have a strong suspicion for sarcopenia. In patients with ECOG-PS 4 ( = 43), 3 ( = 61), and 0-2 ( = 317), 42 (97.7%), 53 (86.9%) and 8 (2.5%) had the SARC-F score ≥ 4. During the follow-up period, 145 patients (34.4%) died. All deaths were cancer-related. The 1-year cumulative overall survival (OS) rate in patients with SARC-F ≥ 4 ( = 103) and SARC-F < 4 ( = 318) was 33.9% and 61.6% ( < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis for the OS, total lymphocyte count ≥ 1081/μL ( = 0.0014), the SARC-F score ≥ 4 ( = 0.0096), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) 1 ( = 0.0147, GPS 0 as a standard), GPS 2 ( < 0.0001, GPS 0 as a standard), ECOG-PS 2 ( < 0.0001, ECOG-PS 0 as a standard), ECOG-PS 3 ( < 0.0001, ECOG-PS 0 as a standard), and ECOG-PS 4 ( < 0.0001, ECOG-PS 0 as a standard) were independent predictors. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the prognostic value of the SARC-F score, the sensitivity/specificity was 0.59/0.70, and best cutoff point of the SARC-F score was two. In conclusion, the SARC-F score is useful in patients with gastrointestinal advanced malignancies.

摘要

我们试图阐明SARC - F评分对胃肠道晚期恶性肿瘤患者(n = 421)的预后影响。SARC - F评分≥4被判定为高度怀疑存在肌肉减少症。在东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为4(n = 43)、3(n = 61)和0 - 2(n = 317)的患者中,SARC - F评分≥4的分别有42例(97.7%)、53例(86.9%)和8例(2.5%)。在随访期间,145例患者(34.4%)死亡。所有死亡均与癌症相关。SARC - F≥4(n = 103)和SARC - F < 4(n = 318)患者的1年累积总生存率(OS)分别为33.9%和61.6%(P < 0.0001)。在OS的多因素分析中,总淋巴细胞计数≥1081/μL(P = 0.0014)、SARC - F评分≥4(P = 0.0096)、格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)为1(P = 0.0147,以GPS 0为标准)、GPS为2(P < 0.0001,以GPS 0为标准)、ECOG - PS为2(P < 0.0001,以ECOG - PS 0为标准)、ECOG - PS为3(P < 0.0001,以ECOG - PS 0为标准)以及ECOG - PS为4(P < 0.0001,以ECOG - PS 0为标准)是独立的预测因素。在对SARC - F评分预后价值的受试者工作特征曲线分析中,敏感度/特异度为0.59/0.70,SARC - F评分的最佳截断点为2。总之,SARC - F评分对胃肠道晚期恶性肿瘤患者有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/eeb944275d2a/cancers-14-00010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/508100beeba2/cancers-14-00010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/abf6e0749a40/cancers-14-00010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/44672fd80d2f/cancers-14-00010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/eeb944275d2a/cancers-14-00010-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/508100beeba2/cancers-14-00010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/abf6e0749a40/cancers-14-00010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/44672fd80d2f/cancers-14-00010-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/8749778/eeb944275d2a/cancers-14-00010-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic Impact of the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Advanced Cancers.SARC-F评分对胃肠道晚期癌症的预后影响
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;14(1):10. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010010.
2
The Relevance in the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及SARC - F评分在胃肠道疾病中的相关性
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 3;11(7):2012. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072012.
3
Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease.肝病患者准确的SARC-F评分
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 4;13(11):1959. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111959.
4
Comparison of SARC-F Score among Gastrointestinal Diseases.胃肠道疾病中SARC-F评分的比较
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 10;10(18):4099. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184099.
5
High SARC-F score predicts poor survival of patients with cancer receiving palliative care.高 SARC-F 评分预示着接受姑息治疗的癌症患者生存状况不佳。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4065-4072. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06845-6. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
The Relationship between the SARC-F Score and the Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases.胃肠道疾病中SARC-F评分与控制营养状况评分之间的关系
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 24;11(3):582. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030582.
7
Accuracy and prognostic ability of the SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii's score in the screening of sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients.SARC-F 问卷和 Ishii 评分在老年住院患者肌少症筛查中的准确性和预后能力。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(9):e8204. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20198204. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Comparing SARC-F with SARC-CalF for screening sarcopenia in advanced cancer patients.比较 SARC-F 与 SARC-CalF 在晚期癌症患者中筛查肌肉减少症的应用。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov;39(11):3337-3345. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
9
Glasgow Prognostic Score is superior to ECOG PS as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding.在伴有腹膜播散的胃癌患者中,格拉斯哥预后评分作为预后因素优于东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Apr;15(4):4193-4200. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7826. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
10
SARC-F Score: A Quick Bedside Tool to Screen Sarcopenia in Patients With Cirrhosis.SARC-F评分:一种用于筛查肝硬化患者肌肉减少症的快速床边工具。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):101318. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.101318. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Nutritional Index Correlates with Liver Function and Prognosis in Chronic Liver Disease Patients.预后营养指数与慢性肝病患者的肝功能及预后相关。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;14(1):49. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010049.
2
Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.血浆白蛋白在预后指标中的作用解读:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6132. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196132.
3
Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease.肝病患者准确的SARC-F评分

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications and prognosis of gastric cancer resection: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.术前肌少症对胃癌切除术术后并发症和预后的影响:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;98:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104534. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
Cancer Cachexia: Its Mechanism and Clinical Significance.癌症恶病质:发病机制及临床意义。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 6;22(16):8491. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168491.
3
Utility of the SARC-F Questionnaire for Sarcopenia Screening in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 4;13(11):1959. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111959.
4
Prevalence of Four Sarcopenia Criteria in Older Patients with Cancer, and Their Predictive Value for 6-Month Mortality: The NutriAgeCancer National Prospective Cohort Study.癌症老年患者中四种肌少症标准的流行情况及其对 6 个月死亡率的预测价值:NutriAgeCancer 全国前瞻性队列研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 21;15(6):1508. doi: 10.3390/nu15061508.
5
The Relevance in the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the SARC-F Score in Gastrointestinal Diseases.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及SARC - F评分在胃肠道疾病中的相关性
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 3;11(7):2012. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072012.
SARC-F问卷在慢性肝病患者肌肉减少症筛查中的应用:日本一项多中心横断面研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):3448. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153448.
4
Pathophysiology and mechanisms of primary sarcopenia (Review).原发性肌肉减少症的病理生理学及机制(综述)
Int J Mol Med. 2021 Aug;48(2). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4989. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Sarcopenia and prognosis of advanced cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症进展期患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的肌肉减少症及其预后:全面系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrition. 2021 Oct;90:111345. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111345. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the SARC-F and Its Modified Versions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.SARC-F 及其修订版的可靠性和同时效度的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Sep;22(9):1864-1876.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Immunological Biomarkers of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的免疫学生物标志物。
Crit Rev Immunol. 2020;40(6):497-512. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2020035652.
8
Sarcopenia as a predictor of postoperative risk of complications, mortality and length of stay following gastrointestinal oncological surgery.肌肉减少症是胃肠道肿瘤手术后并发症、死亡率和住院时间的预测指标。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Oct;103(9):630-637. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0082. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Screening Accuracy of SARC-F for Sarcopenia in the Elderly: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.SARC-F 筛查老年人肌少症的准确性:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(2):172-182. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1471-8.
10
Getting to grips with sarcopenia: recent advances and practical management for the gastroenterologist.认识肌肉减少症:胃肠病学家的最新进展与实际管理
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 20;12(1):53-61. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101348. eCollection 2021.