Suppr超能文献

“大多数确诊病例都已接种疫苗”,那么新冠疫苗还有效吗?对南京疫情期间新浪微博中疫苗有效性讨论的内容分析。

Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Still Work That "Most of the Confirmed Cases Had Been Vaccinated"? A Content Analysis of Vaccine Effectiveness Discussion on Sina Weibo during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Nanjing.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.

School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 26;19(1):241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010241.

Abstract

In July 2021, breakthrough cases were reported in the outbreak of COVID-19 in Nanjing, sparking concern and discussion about the vaccine's effectiveness and becoming a trending topic on Sina Weibo. In order to explore public attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine and their emotional orientations, we collected 1542 posts under the trending topic through data mining. We set up four categories of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines, and used a big data analysis tool to code and manually checked the coding results to complete the content analysis. The results showed that 45.14% of the Weibo posts ( = 1542) supported the COVID-19 vaccine, 12.97% were neutral, and 7.26% were doubtful, which indicated that the public did not question the vaccine's effectiveness due to the breakthrough cases in Nanjing. There were 66.47% posts that reflected significant negative emotions. Among these, 50.44% of posts with negative emotions were directed towards the media, 25.07% towards the posting users, and 11.51% towards the public, which indicated that the negative emotions were not directed towards the COVID-19 vaccine. External sources outside the vaccine might cause vaccine hesitancy. Public opinions expressed in online media reflect the public's cognition and attitude towards vaccines and their core needs in terms of information. Therefore, online public opinion monitoring could be an essential way to understand the opinions and attitudes towards public health issues.

摘要

2021 年 7 月,南京出现新冠肺炎疫情突破病例,引发了公众对疫苗有效性的关注和讨论,成为微博热搜话题。为了探讨公众对新冠疫苗的态度及其情绪取向,我们通过数据挖掘收集了该话题下的 1542 条微博。我们设立了对新冠疫苗的四种态度类别,利用大数据分析工具进行编码,并对编码结果进行人工检查,完成内容分析。结果显示,在 1542 条微博中,45.14%(=1542)的帖子支持新冠疫苗,12.97%的帖子持中立态度,7.26%的帖子对疫苗持怀疑态度,这表明公众并没有因为南京的突破病例而对疫苗的有效性产生质疑。有 66.47%的帖子反映出明显的负面情绪。其中,50.44%的负面情绪帖子针对媒体,25.07%的帖子针对发帖用户,11.51%的帖子针对公众,这表明负面情绪并不是针对新冠疫苗的。疫苗之外的外部因素可能会导致疫苗犹豫。网络媒体上表达的公众意见反映了公众对疫苗的认知和态度,以及他们在信息方面的核心需求。因此,在线舆情监测可能是了解公众对公共卫生问题的意见和态度的重要途径。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验