• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Teachers' Perspectives on Cyberbullying: A Cross-Cultural Study.教师视角下的网络欺凌:跨文化研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 27;19(1):257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010257.
2
Australian Early Childhood Teachers' Understanding of Bullying.澳大利亚幼儿教师对欺凌的理解。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13766-NP13790. doi: 10.1177/08862605211006355. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
School Leadership and Cyberbullying-A Multilevel Analysis.学校领导力与网络欺凌——多层次分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 15;14(10):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101226.
4
Bullying prevalence in Pakistan's educational institutes: Preclusion to the framework for a teacher-led antibullying intervention.巴基斯坦教育机构中的欺凌现象:教师主导的反欺凌干预框架的阻碍。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284864. eCollection 2023.
5
Cyberbullying Characteristics and Prevention-What Can We Learn from Narratives Provided by Adolescents and Their Teachers?网络欺凌的特征和预防——我们能从青少年及其教师提供的叙述中学到什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811589.
6
Individual and contextual predictors of cyberbullying: the influence of children's provictim attitudes and teachers' ability to intervene.个体和情境因素对网络欺凌的预测:儿童的亲被害态度和教师干预能力的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 May;42(5):698-710. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9920-x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Experiences and Perspectives of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in Mainland China-Implications for Policy.中国大陆青少年传统欺凌和网络欺凌的经历与观点——对政策的启示
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 6;12:672223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672223. eCollection 2021.
8
"It is Typical of Teenagers": When Teachers Morally Disengage from Cyberbullying.“这是青少年的典型行为”:当教师在网络欺凌问题上道德失范时
Span J Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;25:e30. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2022.27.
9
Bullying in school children: How much do teachers know?学童中的欺凌行为:教师了解多少?
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jul;8(7):2395-2400. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_370_19.
10
Impact of the TEI Peer Tutoring Program on Coexistence, Bullying and Cyberbullying in Spanish Schools.TEI 朋辈辅导计划对西班牙学校共存、欺凌和网络欺凌的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 24;20(19):6818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196818.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal Cell Phones among Children: Parental Perception of Content-Related Threats and Attempts to Control Them in a Lithuanian Sample.儿童使用个人手机:立陶宛样本中父母对内容相关威胁的认知及控制措施
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;12(6):185. doi: 10.3390/bs12060185.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.基于学校的减少欺凌行为实施和受欺凌情况的项目的有效性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 5;17(2):e1143. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1143. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Perpetration and Victimization in Offline and Cyber Contexts: A Variable- and Person-Oriented Examination of Associations and Differences Regarding Domain-Specific Self-Esteem and School Adjustment.线下和网络环境中的侵害与受害:特定领域自尊和学校适应的关联和差异的变量与个体定向研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 3;18(19):10429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910429.
3
Assessment of School Anti-Bullying Interventions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.学校反欺凌干预措施的评估:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;175(1):44-55. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3541.
4
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.

教师视角下的网络欺凌:跨文化研究

Teachers' Perspectives on Cyberbullying: A Cross-Cultural Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, La Rioja International University, 26006 La Rioja, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 27;19(1):257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010257.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010257
PMID:35010516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8751238/
Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyze the perceptions of Colombian, Spanish, and Ecuadorian teachers regarding cyberbullying from a cross-cultural perspective. A descriptive and analytical method was used with a quantitative approach and 240 teachers answered an ad hoc questionnaire. Most teachers in the three countries say that they do not know how to deal with this type of bullying and have not received training in this respect, with the percentages in the three countries being very similar. Spanish teachers have the highest percentage of lack of concern about cyberbullying and Colombian teachers are the ones who admit to having had the most cases of cyberbullying. In terms of reaction, the majority acted, but among those who did not, Ecuadorian teachers did not due to lack of knowledge. Forced by the pandemic to teach their classes online, teachers are increasingly concerned about cyberbullying. For the three countries, it is considered necessary to take measures in terms of legislating specific protocols to deal with cyberbullying at school and that the training plans for the degrees that give access to this profession include the competencies that allow teachers to develop appropriate strategies to respond to cyberbullying.

摘要

本研究旨在从跨文化视角分析哥伦比亚、西班牙和厄瓜多尔教师对网络欺凌的认知。研究采用描述性和分析性方法,定量研究,共有 240 名教师回答了专门设计的问卷。三个国家的大多数教师表示,他们不知道如何处理这种类型的欺凌行为,也没有接受过这方面的培训,三国的百分比非常相似。西班牙教师对网络欺凌的关注度最低,而哥伦比亚教师承认曾有过最多的网络欺凌事件。在反应方面,大多数教师采取了行动,但在那些没有采取行动的教师中,厄瓜多尔教师是因为缺乏知识。由于大流行期间被迫在线授课,教师越来越关注网络欺凌问题。三国都认为有必要采取措施,制定专门的协议,以处理学校里的网络欺凌问题,并且为进入这一职业的学位制定的培训计划应包括使教师能够制定适当策略来应对网络欺凌的能力。