Suppr超能文献

放疗后颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的远期疗效。

Late Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Radiation Therapy-Induced Carotid Stenosis.

机构信息

CHU Brest, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, Brest, France.

CHU Dijon, Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Dec;29(6):921-928. doi: 10.1177/15266028211068757. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) appears as a promising alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy for radiation therapy (RT)-induced carotid stenosis. However, this is based on a poor level of evidence studies (small sample size, primarily single institution reports, few long-term data). The purpose of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of a multicentric series of CAS for RT-induced stenosis.

METHODS

All CAS for RT-induced stenosis performed in 11 French academic institutions from 2005 to 2017 were collected in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, clinical risk factors, elapsed time from RT, clinical presentation and imaging parameters of carotid stenosis were preoperatively gathered. Long-term outcomes were determined by clinical follow-up and duplex ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of cerebrovascular events during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included perioperative morbidity and mortality rate, long-term mortality rate, primary patency, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one CAS procedures were performed in 112 patients. The mean interval between irradiation and CAS was 15 ± 12 years. In 31.4% of cases, the lesion was symptomatic. Mean follow-up was 42.5 ± 32.6 months (range 1-141 months). The mortality rate at 5 years was 23%. The neurologic event-free survival and the in-stent restenosis rates at 5 years were 87.8% and 38.9%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (p=0.02) and single postoperative antiplatelet therapy (p=0.001) were found to be significant predictors of in-stent restenosis. Freedom from target lesion revascularization was 91.9% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that CAS is an effective option for RT-induced stenosis in patients not favorable to carotid endarterectomy. The CAS was associated with a low rate of neurological events and reinterventions at long-term follow-up.

摘要

目的

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)似乎是一种有前途的替代颈动脉内膜切除术的治疗方法,适用于放射性治疗(RT)引起的颈动脉狭窄。然而,这是基于证据水平较低的研究(样本量小,主要为单一机构报告,长期数据较少)。本研究的目的是报告 11 家法国学术机构进行的多中心 CAS 治疗 RT 诱导的狭窄的长期结果。

方法

本回顾性研究收集了 2005 年至 2017 年期间在 11 家法国学术机构进行的所有 RT 诱导的狭窄的 CAS。术前收集患者的人口统计学、临床危险因素、RT 后时间、颈动脉狭窄的临床表现和影像学参数。通过临床随访和双功超声确定长期结果。主要终点是随访期间发生脑血管事件。次要终点包括围手术期发病率和死亡率、长期死亡率、原发通畅率和靶病变血运重建。

结果

112 例患者共进行了 121 例 CAS 手术。照射与 CAS 之间的平均间隔时间为 15 ± 12 年。在 31.4%的病例中,病变是有症状的。平均随访时间为 42.5 ± 32.6 个月(范围 1-141 个月)。5 年死亡率为 23%。5 年时神经事件无复发率和支架内再狭窄率分别为 87.8%和 38.9%。糖尿病(p=0.02)和术后单一抗血小板治疗(p=0.001)是支架内再狭窄的显著预测因素。5 年时无靶病变血运重建率为 91.9%。

结论

本研究表明,在不适合颈动脉内膜切除术的 RT 诱导狭窄患者中,CAS 是一种有效的选择。在长期随访中,CAS 与较低的神经事件和再介入率相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验