Gunther Jillian R, De La Cruz Denise, Boyce-Fappiano David, Ponnie Annette Eakes, Smith Letericia, Holliday Emma B, Bishop Andrew J, Choi Seungtaek L, Koong Albert C, Das Prajnan, Pinnix Chelsea C
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 0097, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):344-348. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02122-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Subspecialty exposure during medical school can be limited. Moreover, the COVID19 pandemic prevented most onsite elective medical student (MS) rotations during 2020. Therefore, we sought to create and assess the efficacy of an informal virtual elective (IVE) for MSs to explore radiation oncology (RO) at our institution. We created IVE activities including invitations to resident didactics, a faculty lecture series, and interactive virtual events with residents and faculty. MSs were offered RO resident and faculty mentors and the opportunity to deliver a lecture. Pre- and post-IVE evaluation surveys were sent to 27 4th year MSs. Surveys utilized importance ordering (1=most important; reported as median (interquartile range), free response, and Likert-type questions (5 = extremely, 1=not at all). Our IVE, held from July to October 2020, had a median of 11 students (range 7-18) attend each activity. Pre- and post-IVE surveys were completed by 22/27 (81%) and 20/27 (74%) MSs, respectively. In pre-IVE, MSs reported participating in the IVE for faculty/resident interaction (1.5 [1, 2]), networking (3 [2, 3]), and learning (4 [3-5]). In post-IVE, MSs reported benefit from faculty mentors (5 [4, 5]), delivering a presentation (5 [3-5]), and faculty lectures (4.5 [4, 5]). In post-IVE, MSs preferred a full onsite away elective (16, 80%) over an official virtual elective (1, 5%) or IVE (3, 15%). Overall, MSs reported that the IVE provided an adequate introduction to RO at our institution (4 [4, 5]). Alternative virtual elective experiences allow MSs to informally evaluate medical subspecialties and could be offered even if formal elective opportunities are available.
医学院期间接触专科领域的机会可能有限。此外,2020年新冠疫情使得大多数医学生(MS)的现场选修轮转无法进行。因此,我们试图创建并评估一种针对医学生的非正式虚拟选修课(IVE),以让他们在我们机构探索放射肿瘤学(RO)。我们创建了IVE活动,包括邀请住院医师教学、教师讲座系列以及与住院医师和教师的互动虚拟活动。为医学生提供了放射肿瘤学住院医师和教师导师,并给予他们授课的机会。在IVE前后向27名四年级医学生发送了评估调查问卷。调查采用重要性排序(1 = 最重要;报告为中位数(四分位间距)、自由回答以及李克特式问题(5 = 极其,1 = 完全不))。我们于2020年7月至10月举办的IVE,每次活动的学生人数中位数为11名(范围7 - 18名)。IVE前后的调查问卷分别由22/27(81%)和20/27(74%)的医学生完成。在IVE前,医学生报告参与IVE是为了与教师/住院医师互动(1.5 [1, 2])、建立人际关系(3 [2, 3])以及学习(4 [3 - 5])。在IVE后,医学生报告受益于教师导师(5 [4, 5])、进行演讲(5 [3 - 5])以及教师讲座(4.5 [4, 5])。在IVE后,医学生更喜欢完全的现场校外选修(16名,80%),而不是正式的虚拟选修课(1名,5%)或IVE(3名,15%)。总体而言,医学生报告称IVE为他们在我们机构了解放射肿瘤学提供了充分的介绍(4 [4, 5])。替代性的虚拟选修体验让医学生能够非正式地评估医学专科领域,即使有正式的选修机会也可以提供此类体验。