Department of Intensive Care, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2023 May;53(5):723-730. doi: 10.1111/imj.15692. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Central venous access device (CVAD) is a common procedure in ICU which, although generally safe, can lead to acute and delayed complications. Training and accreditation process for its insertion vary worldwide.
The objective of this study was to explore variability in existing training and accreditation processes for central venous access device (CVAD) insertion among different intensive care units (ICU), current practices of CVAD insertion among fellows of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) working in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) and their recommendations for improvement.
A prospective cross-sectional web-based survey was sent through email and CICM e-newsletter to intensivists and directors of ICU across ANZ. All responses were tabulated, post-hoc exploratory analysis using multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used and free texts were analysed thematically and summarised.
A total of 115 responses was received from various public and private ICU from all states of ANZ; 32% of the participants did not have any accreditation process for CVAD insertion skill in their ICU, whereas 91% of respondents revealed there were no processes to assess deskilling. Most intensivists recommended supervision, simulation, various education tools and ultrasound training to improve training and assessment. Thirty-five percent of the participants inserted 0-5 CVAD and more than half of the intensivists had inserted <10 CVAD in a 1-year period. Two-thirds of the respondents recommended inserting between 6 and 20 CVAD each year to maintain competence.
The study identified wide variability in current practice, training methods and accreditation process for CVAD insertion among intensivists and ICU trainees in ANZ. Policy makers should consider revising the current clinical practice and training policies to new policies for accreditation and ongoing assessment for CVAD insertions across ANZ ICU.
中心静脉置管(CVAD)是 ICU 中的常见操作,尽管通常安全,但也可能导致急性和迟发性并发症。其插入的培训和认证过程在全球范围内有所不同。
本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚和新西兰(ANZ)不同 ICU 中 CVAD 插入的现有培训和认证流程的差异、ANZ 中从事重症监护医学(CICM)的研究员目前的 CVAD 插入实践以及他们对改进的建议。
通过电子邮件和 CICM 电子通讯向 ANZ 各地的重症监护医师和 ICU 主任发送了一份前瞻性横断面网络调查。对所有回复进行了制表,使用多变量有序逻辑回归进行了事后探索性分析,并对自由文本进行了主题分析和总结。
共收到来自 ANZ 各州各种公立和私立 ICU 的 115 份回复;32%的参与者所在 ICU 没有 CVAD 插入技能的认证流程,而 91%的受访者表示没有评估技能下降的流程。大多数重症监护医师建议通过监督、模拟、各种教育工具和超声培训来改进培训和评估。35%的参与者插入了 0-5 个 CVAD,超过一半的重症监护医师在一年内插入了<10 个 CVAD。三分之二的受访者建议每年插入 6-20 个 CVAD 以保持能力。
本研究发现,ANZ 地区的重症监护医师和 ICU 受训者在 CVAD 插入的当前实践、培训方法和认证流程方面存在广泛差异。决策者应考虑修订当前的临床实践和培训政策,为 ANZ ICU 的 CVAD 插入制定新的认证和持续评估政策。