Laframboise Natalie A, Seabrook Jamie A, Matthews June I, Dworatzek Paula D N
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, Western University, London, ON.
Department of Paediatrics, Western University, London, ON.
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2022 Jan 11:1-7. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2021-035.
To evaluate foods advertised in discount and premium grocery flyers for their alignment with Canada's 2007 Food Guide (CFG) and assess if alignment differed by food category, season, page location, and price. Weekly flyers (n = 192) were collected from discount and premium grocery chains from each of 4 seasons. Health Canada's Surveillance Tool was used to assess food items as in-line or not in-line with CFG. Of 35 576 food items, 39.7% were in-line with CFG. There were no differences in proportions of foods not in-line in discount versus premium flyers (60.9% and 60.0%, respectively). Other Foods and Meat & Alternatives were advertised most (28.0% and 26.3%, respectively; < 0.001). Milk & Alternatives were the least advertised food group (10.3%). Vegetables & Fruit (19.6%), Grains (21.6%), Milk & Alternatives (20.6%), and Meat & Alternatives (20.2%) were promoted least in Fall ( < 0.001). A higher proportion of foods advertised on middle pages were not in-line (61.0%) compared with front (56.6%) and back (58.8%) pages ( < 0.001). Not in-line foods were more expensive ($3.49, IQR = $2.82) than in-line foods ($3.28, IQR = $2.81; < 0.001). While there was no difference in healthfulness of foods advertised in discount versus premium flyers, grocers advertised more foods not in-line with CFG. Government policies to improve the food environment should consider grocery flyers.
评估折扣杂货店和高档杂货店传单中所宣传的食品是否符合《2007年加拿大食品指南》(CFG),并评估符合程度是否因食品类别、季节、页面位置和价格而有所不同。从4个季节中每个季节的折扣杂货店和高档杂货连锁店收集了每周传单(n = 192)。使用加拿大卫生部的监测工具评估食品项目是否符合CFG。在35576种食品中,39.7%符合CFG。折扣传单和高档传单中不符合要求的食品比例没有差异(分别为60.9%和60.0%)。其他食品和肉类及替代品的广告最多(分别为28.0%和26.3%;P < 0.001)。牛奶及替代品是广告宣传最少的食品类别(10.3%)。秋季蔬菜和水果(19.6%)、谷物(21.6%)、牛奶及替代品(20.6%)和肉类及替代品(20.2%)的促销最少(P < 0.001)。与首页(56.6%)和尾页(58.8%)相比,中间页面上宣传的不符合要求的食品比例更高(61.0%)(P < 0.001)。不符合要求的食品比符合要求的食品更贵(3.49美元,四分位距 = 2.82美元)(3.28美元,四分位距 = 2.81美元;P < 0.001)。虽然折扣传单和高档传单中宣传的食品在健康程度上没有差异,但杂货店宣传的不符合CFG的食品更多。改善食品环境的政府政策应考虑杂货店传单。