Suppr超能文献

数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的日间时间和阅片者经验对召回率和假阳性率的影响。

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.

机构信息

From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, 3rd Floor, Providence, RI 02903 (M.H.B., G.L.B., A.P.L.); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (M.H.B.); Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, RI (G.L.B.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (A.P.L.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):63-68. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210318. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

Abstract

Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) image interpretation might be more cognitively demanding than interpretation of digital mammography (DM) images. The time of day of interpretation might affect recall and false-positive (FP) rates, especially for DBT. Purpose To determine whether recall and FP rates vary by time of day of interpretation for screening mammography for breast cancer performed with DM and DBT. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study examining 97 671 screening mammograms interpreted by 18 radiologists between January 2018 and December 2019 at one of 12 community radiology sites. The association between the time of day of interpretation, the type of image interpreted (DM vs DBT), and radiologist experience (≤5 posttraining years vs >5 posttraining years) and the likelihood of a patient being recalled from screening mammography and the likelihood of whether the interpretation was FP or true positive were analyzed. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear mixed modeling with a binary distribution and sandwich estimation where observations were nested by radiologist. Results Screening mammograms interpreted by 18 radiologists were reviewed (40 220 DBTs, 57 451 DMs). Nine radiologists had 5 or fewer posttraining years of experience, and nine had more than 5 posttraining years of experience. The overall recall rates for DM (10.2%) and DBT (9.0%) were different ( = .006); FP rate also differed (9.8% DM, 8.6% DBT; = .004). For radiologists with 5 or fewer posttraining years of experience, odds of recall increased 11.5% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, = .01) with every hour when using DBT, but this was not found for DM (OR = 1.09, = .06); DBT and DM were different (OR = 1.12 vs 1.09, = .02). For radiologists with more than 5 posttraining years of experience, no evidence of increase in recall was observed for DBT (OR = 1.02, = .27) or DM (OR = 1.0, = .80), and there was no evidence that these were different (OR = 1.02 vs 1.0, = .13). Conclusion Patients were more likely to be recalled when their screening digital breast tomosynthesis images were interpreted later in the day by less-experienced radiologists. © RSNA, 2022

摘要

背景 数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)图像的解读可能比数字乳腺 X 线摄影(DM)图像的解读更具认知挑战性。解读的时间可能会影响召回率和假阳性(FP)率,尤其是对于 DBT。目的 确定在一家社区放射科的 12 个站点中的 18 名放射科医生在 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间对 97671 例筛查性乳腺癌 DM 和 DBT 乳房 X 光片进行解读时,解读时间与所使用的图像类型(DM 与 DBT)以及放射科医生经验(≤5 年培训后经验与>5 年培训后经验)之间是否存在关联,以及这些因素与患者从筛查性乳房 X 光片中被召回的可能性和解读为 FP 或真阳性的可能性之间是否存在关联。使用具有二项分布和夹层估计的广义线性混合模型进行分析,其中观察结果按放射科医生进行嵌套。结果 对 18 名放射科医生进行了审查(40220 例 DBT,57451 例 DM)。9 名放射科医生的培训后经验少于 5 年,9 名放射科医生的培训后经验超过 5 年。DM(10.2%)和 DBT(9.0%)的总体召回率不同(=0.006);FP 率也不同(DM 为 9.8%,DBT 为 8.6%;=0.004)。对于培训后经验少于 5 年的放射科医生,使用 DBT 时,每小时的召回几率增加 11.5%(优势比[OR]=1.12,=0.01),但 DM 没有发现这种情况(OR=1.09,=0.06);DBT 和 DM 不同(OR=1.12 比 1.09,=0.02)。对于培训后经验超过 5 年的放射科医生,未发现 DBT(OR=1.02,=0.27)或 DM(OR=1.0,=0.80)的召回率增加,也没有证据表明两者之间存在差异(OR=1.02 比 1.0,=0.13)。结论 当经验较少的放射科医生在当天较晚时候解读患者的筛查性数字乳腺断层合成图像时,患者更有可能被召回。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验