Killaspy Helen, Harvey Carol, Brasier Catherine, Brophy Lisa, Ennals Priscilla, Fletcher Justine, Hamilton Bridget
Department of Epidemiology and Applied Clinical Research, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):96-123. doi: 10.1002/wps.20940.
People living with severe mental illness (SMI) are one of the most marginalized groups in society. Interventions which aim to improve their social and economic participation are of crucial importance to clinicians, policy-makers and people with SMI themselves. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on social interventions for people with SMI published since 2016 and collated our findings through narrative synthesis. We found an encouragingly large amount of research in this field, and 72 papers met our inclusion criteria. Over half reported on the effectiveness of interventions delivered at the service level (supported accommodation, education or employment), while the remainder targeted individuals directly (community participation, family interventions, peer-led/supported interventions, social skills training). We identified good evidence for the Housing First model of supported accommodation, for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment, and for family psychoeducation, with the caveat that a range of models are nonetheless required to meet the varied housing, employment and family-related needs of individuals. Our findings also highlighted the importance of contextual factors and the need to make local adaptations when "importing" interventions from elsewhere. We found that augmentation strategies to enhance the effectiveness of social interventions (particularly supported employment and social skills training) by addressing cognitive impairments did not lead to transferable "real life" skills despite improvements in cognitive function. We also identified an emerging evidence base for peer-led/supported interventions, recovery colleges and other interventions to support community participation. We concluded that social interventions have considerable benefits but are arguably the most complex in the mental health field, and require multi-level stakeholder commitment and investment for successful implementation.
患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人是社会中最边缘化的群体之一。旨在提高他们社会和经济参与度的干预措施,对临床医生、政策制定者以及患有严重精神疾病的人自身而言都至关重要。我们对2016年以来发表的关于针对患有严重精神疾病者的社会干预措施的文献进行了系统综述,并通过叙述性综合分析整理了我们的研究结果。我们发现该领域的研究数量多得令人鼓舞,有72篇论文符合我们的纳入标准。超过半数的论文报告了在服务层面实施的干预措施(支持性住房、教育或就业)的有效性,而其余论文则直接针对个人(社区参与、家庭干预、同伴主导/支持的干预、社交技能培训)。我们发现有充分证据支持支持性住房的“先住房后治疗”模式、支持性就业的“个人安置与支持”模式以及家庭心理教育,但需要注意的是,仍需要一系列模式来满足个人在住房、就业和家庭相关方面的各种需求。我们的研究结果还强调了背景因素的重要性,以及在从其他地方“引入”干预措施时进行本地化调整的必要性。我们发现,通过解决认知障碍来提高社会干预措施(特别是支持性就业和社交技能培训)有效性的强化策略,尽管认知功能有所改善,但并未带来可转移的“现实生活”技能。我们还发现了关于同伴主导/支持的干预、康复学院以及其他支持社区参与的干预措施的新证据基础。我们得出结论,社会干预措施有相当大的益处,但可以说是心理健康领域中最复杂的,需要多层次利益相关者的承诺和投资才能成功实施。