Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
National Clinician Scholars Program, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):e551-e563. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00634. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented challenges in medical training, and we sought to assess the specific impact of COVID-19 on hematology-oncology (HO) fellowship programs.
We conducted a cross-sectional anonymous online survey of 103 HO program directors (PDs) in conjunction with the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and ASCO. We sought to assess the specific impact of COVID-19 on HO fellowship programs' clinical, educational, and research activities, evaluate perceptions regarding PD and trainee emotional and mental health, and identify ways to support programs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, parametric and nonparametric tests, and multivariable logistic regression models. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed with thematic analysis.
Significant changes to fellowship activities included transitioning fellow training from outpatient clinics to telehealth (77.7%), shifting to virtual education (94.2%), and moving to remote research work (63.1%). A minority (21.4%) of PDs reported that their fellows were redeployed to cover non-HO services. Most PDs (54.4%) believed COVID-19 had a slight negative impact on fellowship training. PD self-reported burnout increased significantly from 15.5% prepandemic to 44.7% during the pandemic, and most PDs witnessed minor signs of fellow burnout (52.4%). Common PD concerns included inadequate supervision for telehealth activities, reduced opportunities for fellow advancement and promotion, lack of professional development activities, limited research operations and funding, program financial constraints, and virtual recruitment.
We encourage institutions and national societies to allocate resources and develop programs that can support fellowships and mitigate the potential negative effects of COVID-19 on trainee and PD career development.
COVID-19 大流行给医学培训带来了前所未有的挑战,我们试图评估 COVID-19 对血液肿瘤学(HO)研究员培训计划的具体影响。
我们与美国血液学会(ASH)和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)合作,对 103 名 HO 项目主任(PD)进行了横断面匿名在线调查。我们试图评估 COVID-19 对 HO 研究员培训计划的临床、教育和研究活动的具体影响,评估 PD 和学员的情绪和心理健康问题的看法,并确定支持计划的方法。使用描述性统计、参数和非参数检验以及多变量逻辑回归模型分析数据。对开放式问题的回答进行主题分析。
研究员培训活动发生了重大变化,包括将研究员培训从门诊转移到远程医疗(77.7%)、转向虚拟教育(94.2%)以及开展远程研究工作(63.1%)。少数(21.4%)PD 报告说,他们的研究员被重新部署到非 HO 服务领域。大多数 PD(54.4%)认为 COVID-19 对研究员培训有轻微的负面影响。PD 自我报告的倦怠感从大流行前的 15.5%显著增加到 44.7%,大多数 PD 看到了研究员倦怠的轻微迹象(52.4%)。PD 普遍关注的问题包括远程医疗活动的监督不足、研究员晋升和晋升机会减少、缺乏专业发展活动、研究运营和资金有限、计划财务限制以及虚拟招聘。
我们鼓励机构和国家学会分配资源并制定计划,以支持研究员培训并减轻 COVID-19 对学员和 PD 职业发展的潜在负面影响。