Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Feb 1;43(2):e235-e242. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003380.
To compare the efficacy of the TRV-chair, a mechanical rotational chair, against manual treatment maneuvers in the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).
Prospective open-label block-randomized controlled clinical trial.
Tertiary referral center.
Seventy-four patients referred from primary care and subsequently diagnosed with BPPV.
Patients were randomized to diagnostics and treatment with either manual treatment maneuvers on an examination table or using the TRV-chair.
The primary outcome was treatment efficacy, defined as absence of positional nystagmus (with or without concomitant vertigo), following one treatment. Secondary outcomes were number of treatments necessary for treatment success and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores.
61.1% of the subjects in the TRV-group and 63.2% in the manual treatment group were treated successfully (p = 0.856). The differences in the number of treatments necessary to achieve treatment success as well as pre- and post-treatment DHI-scores between the TRV-group and the manual treatment group were nonsignificant.
Traditional manual treatment maneuvers and treatment maneuvers performed with the TRV-chair are equally good at treating BPPV in patients referred directly from primary care.
比较 TRV 椅(一种机械旋转椅)与手动治疗手法在治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)中的疗效。
前瞻性开放标签分块随机对照临床试验。
三级转诊中心。
74 名来自初级保健的患者,随后被诊断为 BPPV。
患者被随机分配进行诊断和治疗,分别是在检查台上进行手动治疗手法或使用 TRV 椅。
主要结局是单次治疗后位置性眼球震颤(伴或不伴伴随眩晕)消失的治疗效果。次要结局是治疗成功所需的治疗次数和眩晕残障量表(DHI)评分。
TRV 椅组 61.1%的受试者和手动治疗组 63.2%的受试者治疗成功(p=0.856)。TRV 椅组和手动治疗组在治疗成功所需的治疗次数以及治疗前后 DHI 评分方面的差异无统计学意义。
直接从初级保健转诊的患者中,传统的手动治疗手法和 TRV 椅治疗手法在治疗 BPPV 方面同样有效。