Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Departments of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;48(6):1356-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.473. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
Multiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS).
A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0.
A total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13-2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83-3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001).
TNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.
在治疗胰腺腺癌方面,已经提出了多种新辅助治疗方案,包括化疗(CT)、放化疗(CRT)和全新辅助治疗(TNT),定义为 CT 加 CRT。少数情况下可以达到病理完全缓解(pCR)。我们假设 TNT 比其他新辅助治疗更有可能导致 pCR,这可能会提高总生存率(OS)。
对 2006 年至 2016 年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)进行了回顾性分析,确定了接受任何新辅助治疗后接受确定性胰腺切除术治疗局部晚期或交界可切除胰腺腺癌的患者。病理完全缓解定义为从任何临床分期降期至病理分期 0 期。
共确定了 5402 例接受新辅助治疗后接受切除术的患者。177 例(3.3%)患者达到 pCR。在达到 pCR 的患者中,57 例接受 CT,41 例接受 CRT,79 例接受 TNT。多变量分析显示,与 CRT(OR 1.67,CI 1.13-2.46,p=0.0103)或 CT(OR 2.61,CI 1.83-3.71,p<0.0001)相比,TNT 更有可能导致 pCR。达到 pCR 的患者的 OS 明显更高,中位生存时间为 64.9 个月,而未达到 pCR 的患者为 21.6 个月(p<0.0001)。
与 CT 或 CRT 相比,TNT 可能更有可能达到 pCR。与有残留疾病的患者相比,达到 pCR 的患者具有显著的 OS 获益。对于需要新辅助治疗的患者,应考虑使用 TNT,因为它可能增加达到 pCR 的可能性,从而有可能提高 OS。