Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Pharmacy Practice Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Aug;18(8):3444-3447. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Community pharmacies and pharmacists predominantly operate in a retail environment independently of other health care providers, and they are not often viewed as an integral member of the healthcare team. Thus, they remain overlooked or excluded during integration processes of health care systems. At the same time, there are calls by the profession at national and international levels for community pharmacy to be integrated within primary care systems. The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have further stimulated this desire. When pressing for integration, various terms, such as integration, integrated care, or interprofessional collaboration, are used in an interchangeable manner leading to lack of clarity, ambiguity and confusion for health care policy makers, planners, and other healthcare professionals. The literature was reviewed to identify critical components for community pharmacy to consider for integration. From the five selected articles describing integration of community pharmacies, four different constructs were identified: consensus, connectivity, communication and trust. The integration of community pharmacy into the health system may translate into better access for patients to primary care services, contribute to cost effectiveness, and promulgate the sustainability of the system. However significant political, economic, social, and practice change would be required by all stakeholders. Further research is needed to underpin a consensus for a definition, the type of integration, and the model optimally suited to integrate community pharmacy into primary care. These models, specific and adaptable to each national health care system and political environment, would need to be consensus-based by principal stakeholders to overcome a variety of barriers, including government resistance. Mere calls or demands by the pharmaceutical profession, although laudable, will not be sufficient to overcome the historical, cultural, and economic challenges.
社区药房和药剂师主要在零售环境中独立于其他医疗保健提供者运营,他们通常不被视为医疗保健团队的不可或缺的成员。因此,在医疗保健系统的整合过程中,他们仍然被忽视或排除在外。与此同时,在国家和国际层面上,该行业呼吁将社区药房纳入初级保健系统。COVID-19 大流行似乎进一步激发了这种愿望。在推动整合时,各种术语,如整合、综合护理或跨专业合作,以可互换的方式使用,导致医疗保健政策制定者、规划者和其他医疗保健专业人员缺乏清晰度、歧义性和混淆。对文献进行了回顾,以确定社区药房在整合时需要考虑的关键因素。从描述社区药房整合的五篇选定文章中,确定了四个不同的构建:共识、连接、沟通和信任。将社区药房纳入卫生系统可能会使患者更好地获得初级保健服务,有助于提高成本效益,并促进系统的可持续性。然而,所有利益相关者都需要进行重大的政治、经济、社会和实践变革。需要进一步研究为定义、整合类型和最适合将社区药房整合到初级保健中的模式提供共识。这些模型具体且适用于每个国家的医疗保健系统和政治环境,需要主要利益相关者达成共识,以克服各种障碍,包括政府的抵制。仅仅是制药行业的呼吁或要求,尽管值得称赞,但不足以克服历史、文化和经济方面的挑战。