Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow, UK
School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e050979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050979.
To explore the experiences of people living with long COVID and how they perceive the healthcare services available to them.
Qualitative systematic review.
Electronic literature searches of websites, bibliographic databases and discussion forums, including PubMed LitCovid, Proquest COVID, EPPI Centre living systematic map of evidence, medRxiv, bioRxiv, Medline, Psychinfo and Web of Science Core Collection were conducted to identify qualitative literature published in English up to 13 January 2021.
Papers reporting qualitative or mixed-methods studies that focused on the experiences of long COVID and/or perceptions of accessing healthcare by people with long COVID. Title/abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers independently, with conflicts resolved by discussion or a third reviewer.
Two reviewers independently appraised included studies using the qualitative CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) checklist. Conflicts were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer.
Thematic synthesis, involving line-by-line reading, generation of concepts, descriptive and analytical themes, was conducted by the review team with regular discussion.
Five studies published in 2020 met the inclusion criteria, two international surveys and three qualitative studies from the UK. Sample sizes varied from 24 (interview study) to 3762 (survey). Participants were predominantly young white females recruited from social media or online support groups. Three analytical themes were generated: (1) symptoms and self-directed management of long COVID; (2) emotional aspects of living with long COVID and (3) healthcare experiences associated with long COVID.
People experience long COVID as a heterogeneous condition, with a variety of physical and emotional consequences. It appears that greater knowledge of long COVID is required by a number of stakeholders and that the design of emerging long COVID services or adaptation of existing services for long COVID patients should take account of patients' experiences in their design.
探索长期新冠患者的体验,以及他们如何看待现有的医疗服务。
定性系统综述。
电子文献检索网站、书目数据库和讨论论坛,包括 PubMedLitCovid、ProquestCOVID、EPPI 中心生活系统证据图谱、medRxiv、bioRxiv、Medline、Psychinfo 和 Web of Science Core Collection,以确定截至 2021 年 1 月 13 日以英文发表的定性文献。
报告长期新冠患者体验或以长期新冠患者获得医疗服务的看法为重点的定性或混合方法研究的论文。两位审稿人独立进行标题/摘要和全文筛选,通过讨论或第三位审稿人解决冲突。
两位审稿人独立使用定性 CASP(批判性评估技能计划)检查表评估纳入研究。通过讨论或第三位审稿人解决冲突。
综述团队进行了主题综合,包括逐行阅读、概念生成、描述性和分析性主题,定期进行讨论。
2020 年发表的五项研究符合纳入标准,其中两项为国际调查,三项为英国的定性研究。样本量从 24 名(访谈研究)到 3762 名(调查)不等。参与者主要是从社交媒体或在线支持团体招募的年轻白人女性。生成了三个分析主题:(1)长期新冠的症状和自我管理;(2)长期新冠的情绪方面;(3)与长期新冠相关的医疗体验。
人们将长期新冠视为一种异质性疾病,具有多种身体和情绪后果。似乎需要让许多利益相关者更多地了解长期新冠,并且在设计新的长期新冠服务或为长期新冠患者调整现有服务时,应考虑到患者的体验。