Bogaerds-Hazenberg Suzanne T M, Evers-Vermeul Jacqueline, van den Bergh Huub
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Read Writ. 2022;35(7):1497-1523. doi: 10.1007/s11145-021-10244-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
In the Netherlands, the quality of the reading curriculum is currently under debate because of disappointing results on national and international assessments of students' reading skills and motivation. In a mixed-method study, we analyzed the content of Dutch textbooks for reading comprehension instruction (i.e., the implemented curriculum) and teachers' evaluation and use of these books (i.e., the enacted curriculum). A materials analysis of reading comprehension lessons (N = 80) in eight textbooks for grades 4 and 5 was complemented with semi-structured teacher interviews (N = 29) and lesson observations (N = 11), with a focus on the quality of reading strategy and text structure instruction in the curriculum. Main findings are (1) a lack of alignment between lesson goals, theory, and assignments, (2) a strong focus on practicing strategies, (3) limited declarative knowledge about strategies and text structure, (4) little opportunities for self-regulated strategy application. The teachers that were interviewed mention similar problems, but still hardly deviate from the textbook's content and pedagogical guidelines. We make recommendations to improve the quality of the curriculum.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11145-021-10244-4.
在荷兰,由于学生阅读技能和动机的国家及国际评估结果令人失望,阅读课程的质量目前正处于争论之中。在一项混合方法研究中,我们分析了荷兰用于阅读理解教学的教科书内容(即实施的课程)以及教师对这些书籍的评估和使用情况(即 enacted 课程)。对四、五年级的八本教科书中的阅读理解课程(N = 80)进行材料分析,并辅以半结构化教师访谈(N = 29)和课堂观察(N = 11),重点关注课程中阅读策略和文本结构教学的质量。主要发现包括:(1)课程目标、理论和作业之间缺乏一致性;(2)强烈关注策略练习;(3)关于策略和文本结构的陈述性知识有限;(4)自我调节策略应用的机会很少。接受访谈的教师提到了类似的问题,但仍然几乎没有偏离教科书的内容和教学指导方针。我们提出了提高课程质量的建议。
在线版本包含可在 10.1007/s11145 - 021 - 10244 - 4 获取的补充材料。