Alamri Abeer Ayiad, Almutairi Ayad Bulayd, Hawsah Abeer Mohammed, Aljarullah Atheer Hussain, Almeerabdullah Yara Waleed, Alenezi Maha Abdullah, Ahmed Suhael
Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Medical University of Lodz, Poland, Europe.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1655-S1658. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_390_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
External high-volume extraction (HVE) devices may offer a way to reduce any aerosol particulate generated. The aim of this study was to measure the particle count during dental aerosol-generating procedures and compare the results with when a HVE device is used.
Design A comparative clinical study measuring the amount of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 aerosol particulate with and without the use of an external HVE device was undertaken. Materials and methods in total, ten restorative procedures were monitored with an industrial Trotec PC220 particle counter. The intervention was an external HVE device. Main outcome methods the air sampler was placed at the average working distance of the clinicians involved in the study - 420 mm.
In the present study, aerosol particulate was recorded at statistically significantly increased levels during dental procedures without an external HVE device versus with the device. Discussion The null hypothesis was rejected, in that significant differences were found between the results of the amount of aerosol particle count with and without a HVE device.
If the results of the present study are repeated in an setting, an external high-volume suction device may potentially show a lower risk of transmission of viral particulate.
外部大容量抽吸(HVE)设备可能提供一种减少产生的任何气溶胶颗粒的方法。本研究的目的是测量牙科气溶胶产生过程中的颗粒计数,并将结果与使用HVE设备时的结果进行比较。
设计进行一项比较临床研究,测量使用和不使用外部HVE设备时PM1、PM2.5和PM10气溶胶颗粒的量。材料与方法总共用工业Trotec PC220颗粒计数器监测了10次修复操作。干预措施是使用外部HVE设备。主要结果方法空气采样器放置在参与研究的临床医生的平均工作距离——420毫米处。
在本研究中,与使用设备相比,在没有外部HVE设备的牙科操作过程中,气溶胶颗粒的记录水平在统计学上显著增加。讨论原假设被拒绝,因为在有和没有HVE设备的气溶胶颗粒计数结果之间发现了显著差异。
如果本研究的结果在[具体环境]中得到重复,外部大容量抽吸设备可能潜在地显示出较低的病毒颗粒传播风险。