Burmeister David M, Heard Tiffany C, Chao Tony, Alcover Karl, Wagner Amanda, Chung Kevin K, Akers Kevin S
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX.
Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jan 5;4(1):e0610. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000610. eCollection 2022 Jan.
To compare the diagnostic value of clinical sepsis criteria to novel protein biomarkers in the burn patient.
Prospective observational study.
American Burn Association verified Burn Center ICU.
Burn patients ( = 24) and healthy volunteers ( = 10).
Enrolled burn patients ( = 24) were stratified based on whether or not they met a clinical definition of sepsis. Four separate clinical criteria for sepsis were analyzed for their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, which were compared to a panel of protein biomarkers. The most significant protein biomarkers were further analyzed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs).
Of the clinical criteria, SEPSIS-2 criteria led to the highest AUROC (0.781; < 0.001), followed by the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (AUROC = 0.670; = 0.022). Multiplexing revealed a number of inflammatory proteins (complement C5) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP7) that were significantly elevated in septic samples compared with both healthy controls and nonseptic burn samples. Furthermore, three proteins associated with endothelial dysfunction and glycocalyx shedding revealed diagnostic potential. Specifically, syndecan-1, p-selectin, and galectin-1 were all significantly elevated in sepsis, and all resulted in an AUROC greater than 0.7; analyzing the sum of these three markers led to an AUROC of 0.808.
These data reveal several potential biomarkers that may help with sepsis diagnosis in the burn patient. Furthermore, the role of endotheliopathy as a mechanistic etiology for sepsis after burns warrants further investigation.
比较临床脓毒症标准与新型蛋白质生物标志物对烧伤患者的诊断价值。
前瞻性观察研究。
美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心重症监护病房。
烧伤患者(n = 24)和健康志愿者(n = 10)。
纳入的烧伤患者(n = 24)根据是否符合脓毒症的临床定义进行分层。分析了四种不同的脓毒症临床标准的诊断敏感性和特异性,并与一组蛋白质生物标志物进行比较。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)对最显著的蛋白质生物标志物进行进一步分析。
在临床标准中,SEPSIS-2标准的AUROC最高(0.781;P < 0.001),其次是快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(AUROC = 0.670;P = 0.022)。多重分析显示,与健康对照和非脓毒症烧伤样本相比,脓毒症样本中有多种炎症蛋白(补体C5)和基质金属蛋白酶(MMP1、MMP7)显著升高。此外,三种与内皮功能障碍和糖萼脱落相关的蛋白质显示出诊断潜力。具体而言,多配体蛋白聚糖-1、p-选择素和半乳糖凝集素-1在脓毒症中均显著升高,且AUROC均大于0.7;分析这三种标志物的总和得出AUROC为0.808。
这些数据揭示了几种可能有助于烧伤患者脓毒症诊断的潜在生物标志物。此外,内皮病变作为烧伤后脓毒症的发病机制病因的作用值得进一步研究。