Suppr超能文献

患者对讨论可植入心脏除颤器在生命末期停用的开放性:一项横断面研究。

Patients' openness to discussing implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at end of life: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jong-ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea.

College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Oct 14;21(7):687-693. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab130.

Abstract

AIMS

It is recommended that patients and clinicians discuss end-of-life deactivation of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prior to device implantation and throughout the illness trajectory to facilitate shared decision-making. However, such discussions rarely occur, and little is known about patients' openness to this discussion. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with patients' openness to discussing end-of-life ICD deactivation with clinicians.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with an ICD from outpatient clinics in the USA, Australia, and South Korea. Patients were classified into an open or resistant group based on their desire to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors related to patients' openness to this discussion.About half of the participants (57.7%) were open to discussing such issues with their clinicians. Factors related to patients' openness to discussing device deactivation at end of life were living with someone, not having severe comorbid conditions (cancer and/or chronic kidney disease), greater ICD knowledge, and more experience discussing end-of-life issues with clinicians (odds ratio: 0.479, 0.382, 1.172, 1.332, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the ICD recipients were reluctant to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Unmodifiable factors were their living arrangement and severe comorbidity. ICD knowledge and prior experience discussing end-of-life issues were potentially modifiable factors in the future. These factors should be addressed when assessing patients' readiness for a shared discussion about device deactivation at end of life.

摘要

目的

建议患者和临床医生在植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 植入前以及在整个疾病过程中讨论生命末期 ICD 的停用,以促进共同决策。然而,这种讨论很少发生,并且对于患者对这种讨论的开放性知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨与患者与临床医生讨论生命末期 ICD 停用的开放性相关的因素。

方法和结果

这项横断面研究在美国、澳大利亚和韩国的门诊诊所招募了 293 名 ICD 患者。根据他们与临床医生讨论生命末期设备停用的意愿,将患者分为开放组或抗拒组。使用多变量逻辑回归探讨与患者对这种讨论的开放性相关的因素。约一半的参与者(57.7%)愿意与他们的临床医生讨论这些问题。与患者对讨论生命末期设备停用的开放性相关的因素包括与他人同住、没有严重合并症(癌症和/或慢性肾脏病)、对 ICD 知识的了解更多,以及与临床医生讨论生命末期问题的经验更多(比值比:0.479、0.382、1.172、1.332,分别)。

结论

大约一半的 ICD 接受者不愿意与临床医生讨论生命末期的设备停用。不可改变的因素是他们的居住安排和严重的合并症。ICD 知识和之前讨论生命末期问题的经验可能是未来的可改变因素。在评估患者对生命末期设备停用的共同讨论准备情况时,应考虑这些因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验