College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jong-ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea.
College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Oct 14;21(7):687-693. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab130.
It is recommended that patients and clinicians discuss end-of-life deactivation of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prior to device implantation and throughout the illness trajectory to facilitate shared decision-making. However, such discussions rarely occur, and little is known about patients' openness to this discussion. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with patients' openness to discussing end-of-life ICD deactivation with clinicians.
This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with an ICD from outpatient clinics in the USA, Australia, and South Korea. Patients were classified into an open or resistant group based on their desire to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors related to patients' openness to this discussion.About half of the participants (57.7%) were open to discussing such issues with their clinicians. Factors related to patients' openness to discussing device deactivation at end of life were living with someone, not having severe comorbid conditions (cancer and/or chronic kidney disease), greater ICD knowledge, and more experience discussing end-of-life issues with clinicians (odds ratio: 0.479, 0.382, 1.172, 1.332, respectively).
Approximately half of the ICD recipients were reluctant to discuss device deactivation at end of life with clinicians. Unmodifiable factors were their living arrangement and severe comorbidity. ICD knowledge and prior experience discussing end-of-life issues were potentially modifiable factors in the future. These factors should be addressed when assessing patients' readiness for a shared discussion about device deactivation at end of life.
建议患者和临床医生在植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 植入前以及在整个疾病过程中讨论生命末期 ICD 的停用,以促进共同决策。然而,这种讨论很少发生,并且对于患者对这种讨论的开放性知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨与患者与临床医生讨论生命末期 ICD 停用的开放性相关的因素。
这项横断面研究在美国、澳大利亚和韩国的门诊诊所招募了 293 名 ICD 患者。根据他们与临床医生讨论生命末期设备停用的意愿,将患者分为开放组或抗拒组。使用多变量逻辑回归探讨与患者对这种讨论的开放性相关的因素。约一半的参与者(57.7%)愿意与他们的临床医生讨论这些问题。与患者对讨论生命末期设备停用的开放性相关的因素包括与他人同住、没有严重合并症(癌症和/或慢性肾脏病)、对 ICD 知识的了解更多,以及与临床医生讨论生命末期问题的经验更多(比值比:0.479、0.382、1.172、1.332,分别)。
大约一半的 ICD 接受者不愿意与临床医生讨论生命末期的设备停用。不可改变的因素是他们的居住安排和严重的合并症。ICD 知识和之前讨论生命末期问题的经验可能是未来的可改变因素。在评估患者对生命末期设备停用的共同讨论准备情况时,应考虑这些因素。