Suppr超能文献

使用靶向平均总偏差的趋势分析评估晚期青光眼的视野进展。

Evaluating Visual Field Progression in Advanced Glaucoma Using Trend Analysis of Targeted Mean Total Deviation.

机构信息

Departments of Ophthalmology.

Innovative Visual Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2022 Apr 1;31(4):235-241. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001985.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Trend analysis of visual field (VF) global indices may underestimate the rate of progression in severe glaucoma because of the influence of test points without detectable sensitivity. To test this hypothesis, we compared the rates of change of VF global indices with and without exclusion of undetectable points at various disease stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six hundred and forty-eight eyes of 366 glaucoma patients with 8 or more reliable 30-2 standard automated perimetry over more than 2 years were enrolled. We calculated targeted mean total deviation (TMTD) by averaging total deviation except points which were consistently undetectable in 3 baseline tests. Eyes were classified as early (≥-6 dB), moderate (-6 dB to -12 dB), advanced (-12 dB to -20 dB), and severe (<-20 dB) based on baseline mean deviation (MD). The rates of change of MD and TMTD in each stage were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Mean age±SD at baseline was 56.9±11.9 years. The MD slope (-0.34 dB/y) in severe glaucoma was significantly slower than TMTD slope (-0.42 dB/y, P=0.028) and was slower than MD slopes in the other stages. Difference between MD slopes and TMTD slopes was most prominent in eyes with MD values less than -25 dB (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Undetectable locations in eyes with severe glaucoma may underestimate the rates of VF progression. Trend analysis of TMTD rather than global indices offers a practical and simple approach for alleviating underestimation of VF progression in severe glaucoma.

摘要

目的

视野(VF)全局指数的趋势分析可能会低估严重青光眼的进展速度,因为测试点中存在无法检测到敏感性的点。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了在不同疾病阶段排除无法检测到的点前后 VF 全局指数的变化率。

材料和方法

共纳入 366 名青光眼患者的 648 只眼,这些患者在 2 年以上的时间内进行了 8 次或更多次可靠的 30-2 标准自动视野检查。我们通过平均除了在 3 次基线测试中始终无法检测到的点之外的总偏差来计算目标平均总偏差(TMTD)。根据基线平均偏差(MD),将眼睛分为早期(≥-6dB)、中度(-6dB 至-12dB)、晚期(-12dB 至-20dB)和严重(<-20dB)。统计比较每个阶段 MD 和 TMTD 的变化率。

结果

基线时的平均年龄±标准差为 56.9±11.9 岁。严重青光眼的 MD 斜率(-0.34dB/y)明显慢于 TMTD 斜率(-0.42dB/y,P=0.028),也慢于其他阶段的 MD 斜率。在 MD 值小于-25dB 的眼睛中,MD 斜率和 TMTD 斜率之间的差异最为明显(P=0.002)。

结论

严重青光眼患者中无法检测到的位置可能会低估 VF 进展的速度。TMTD 趋势分析而不是全局指数为缓解严重青光眼 VF 进展的低估提供了一种实用且简单的方法。

相似文献

3
Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
4
The Effect of Achieving Target Intraocular Pressure on Visual Field Worsening.
Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan;129(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127233. eCollection 2015.
6
Baseline Age and Mean Deviation Affect the Rate of Glaucomatous Vision Loss.
J Glaucoma. 2020 Jan;29(1):31-38. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001401.
7
Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
8
Intereye comparison of visual field progression in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;67(3):312-317. doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-00982-z. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
9
Fast Progressors in Glaucoma: Prevalence Based on Global and Central Visual Field Loss.
Ophthalmology. 2023 May;130(5):462-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
10
Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jun;127(6):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验