Suppr超能文献

不同药物产品中使用相同的 INN“依鲁替尼”:专有全球安全数据库中不良事件的影响分析。

Use of Identical INN "Imiglucerase" for Different Drug Products: Impact Analysis of Adverse Events in a Proprietary Global Safety Database.

机构信息

Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;45(2):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01125-4. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approved in 1994 and assigned the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) imiglucerase by the World Health Organization, Cerezyme (Sanofi Genzyme) is an enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Gaucher disease in > 90 countries. At least two therapies approved outside the USA and the European Union, Abcertin and Asbroder, have adopted the identical INN imiglucerase. Both drugs were approved via regulatory pathways not aligned with World Health Organization Similar Biotherapeutic Product guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed whether the use of the identical INN "imiglucerase" for these drugs impacts adverse event (AE) reporting in the Sanofi Global Safety Database.

METHODS

First, we reviewed all imiglucerase individual case safety reports (referred to as cases) including AE data reported between January 2012 and March 2018 that contained Abcertin or Asbroder in the narrative. In a second analysis, we examined cases from Mexico reported between May 2013 and March 2018 to assess changes in imiglucerase reporting following the 2015 approval of Asbroder in Mexico.

RESULTS

Fifty-six cases mentioning Asbroder and none mentioning Abcertin were retrieved in the first analysis. Upon close review, the AEs of 45 cases (80.4%) were attributed to Asbroder, one (1.8%) to Cerezyme; the specific drug attribution for the AEs of ten cases (17.9%) could not be determined. In the second analysis, a substantial increase in cases and AEs was observed in the period after Asbroder approval (73 cases with 150 AEs pre-approval vs 132 cases with 333 AEs post-approval). Twenty-three of 132 (17.4%) post-approval cases reported discontinuation of treatment (19 related to Asbroder AEs, and four related to Cerezyme AEs). Infusion-associated reactions occurred in 25/132 cases (17 Asbroder related, six Cerezyme related, two indeterminate).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates two potential consequences of identical INN use between Cerezyme and Asbroder: (1) an aggregate safety profile for Cerezyme that includes other products using the identical INN leading to inaccurate pharmacovigilance data and (2) healthcare providers switching, substituting, or potentially assuming interchangeability between the products. Identical INN use without the brand name differentiator may compromise pharmacovigilance data, potentially masking differences in safety profiles between products.

摘要

简介

依那西普(Etanercept)于 1994 年获得批准,并被世界卫生组织(WHO)赋予国际非专利名称(INN)依那西普,是一种酶替代疗法,用于治疗 >90 个国家的戈谢病。至少有两种在美国和欧盟以外获得批准的药物,Abcertin 和 Asbroder,采用了相同的 INN 依那西普。这两种药物均通过与世界卫生组织相似的生物治疗产品指南不一致的监管途径获得批准。

目的

我们分析了这些药物使用相同的 INN“依那西普”是否会影响赛诺菲全球安全数据库中的不良事件(AE)报告。

方法

首先,我们审查了所有包含 Abcertin 或 Asbroder 描述的依那西普个体病例安全报告(简称病例),包括 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月期间报告的 AE 数据。在第二项分析中,我们检查了 2013 年 5 月至 2018 年 3 月期间来自墨西哥的病例,以评估 2015 年 Asbroder 在墨西哥获得批准后依那西普报告的变化。

结果

在第一项分析中,检索到 56 例提及 Asbroder 而无一例提及 Abcertin 的病例。经过仔细审查,45 例(80.4%)AE 归因于 Asbroder,1 例(1.8%)归因于 Cerezyme;10 例(17.9%)AE 的具体药物归属无法确定。在第二项分析中,在 Asbroder 批准后,病例和 AE 数量均大幅增加(批准前有 73 例病例和 150 例 AE,批准后有 132 例病例和 333 例 AE)。132 例病例中有 23 例(17.4%)停止治疗(19 例与 Asbroder AE 相关,4 例与 Cerezyme AE 相关)。输注相关反应发生在 25/132 例(17 例与 Asbroder 相关,6 例与 Cerezyme 相关,2 例不确定)。

结论

本分析表明,依那西普和 Asbroder 之间使用相同的 INN 可能会产生两种潜在后果:(1)汇总 Cerezyme 的安全性概况,其中包括使用相同 INN 的其他产品,导致药物警戒数据不准确;(2)医疗保健提供者切换、替代或潜在地假定产品之间的可互换性。没有品牌名称区别的相同 INN 使用可能会损害药物警戒数据,潜在地掩盖产品之间安全性概况的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8857131/6be57ae3cfed/40264_2021_1125_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验