ScitoVation, 6 Davis Drive, Suite 146, Durham, NC 27709, United States of America.
ScitoVation, 6 Davis Drive, Suite 146, Durham, NC 27709, United States of America; Cell Microsystems, 801 Capitola Dr., Suite 10, Durham, NC 27713, United States of America.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2022 Apr;80:105311. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105311. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
There is increasing interest in using modern 'omics technologies, such as whole transcriptome sequencing, to inform decisions about human health safety and chemical toxicity hazard. High throughput methodologies using in vitro assays offer a path forward in reducing or eliminating animal testing. However, many aspects of these technologies need assessment before they will gain the trust of regulators and the public as viable alternative test methods for human health and safety. We used a high throughput whole transcriptome sequence assay (TempO-Seq) to assess the use of three widely used cancer cell lines (HepG2, MCF7, and Ishikawa cells) as in vitro systems for determination of cellular modes of action for two well studied compounds with canonical liver responses: ketoconazole and phenobarbital. We evaluated transcriptomic data to infer points of departure for use in risk analyses of compounds. Both compounds displayed shortcomings in evidence for canonical liver-related responses in any cell line, despite a strong dose response in all three. This raises questions about the competence of simple, mono-cultured cancer cell lines as appropriate surrogates for some adverse effects or toxic endpoints. Points of departure derived from benchmark doses were highly consistent across all three cell lines however, indicating the use of transcriptomic BMD analyses for such purposes would be a reliable and consistent approach.
人们越来越感兴趣地使用现代“组学”技术,如全转录组测序,为人类健康安全和化学毒性危害的决策提供信息。使用体外检测的高通量方法为减少或消除动物测试提供了一种途径。然而,在这些技术获得监管机构和公众的信任之前,作为人类健康和安全的可行替代测试方法,它们需要对许多方面进行评估。我们使用高通量全转录组序列测定(TempO-Seq)来评估三种广泛使用的癌细胞系(HepG2、MCF7 和 Ishikawa 细胞)作为体外系统,用于确定两种具有经典肝脏反应的研究充分的化合物的细胞作用模式:酮康唑和苯巴比妥。我们评估了转录组数据,以推断用于化合物风险分析的起点。尽管所有三种细胞系都有强烈的剂量反应,但这两种化合物在任何细胞系中都显示出与经典肝脏相关反应的证据不足。这引发了关于简单的、单一培养的癌细胞系作为某些不良反应或毒性终点的适当替代品的能力的问题。然而,所有三种细胞系的基准剂量得出的起点高度一致,表明使用转录组 BMD 分析来达到这种目的将是一种可靠和一致的方法。