• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Commitment and Extra-Dyadic Sexual Activity in College Students' Friends with Benefits Relationships: Moderating Effects of Gender.大学生“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的承诺与婚外性行为:性别的调节作用
J Sex Res. 2023 Oct;60(8):1181-1192. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.2022585. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships.识别和阐明有伴之性友谊关系中的变化。
J Sex Res. 2013;50(1):37-47. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.623797. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners.性沟通、性满意度与炮友和恋人的 condom 使用行为。
J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):74-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.719167. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships.“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的审视规则。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1783-1792. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02114-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
Male Partners' Investment and Alternatives as Correlates of Women's Coerced First Sexual Intercourse in Chinese Dating Relationships: A Social Exchange Perspective.男性伴侣的投入与替代选择对中国约会关系中女性被迫初次性经历的影响:社会交换视角。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(1):182-199. doi: 10.1177/0886260516674939. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Couple Identity, Sacrifice, and Availability of Alternative Partners: Dedication in Friends With Benefits Relationships.情侣身份、牺牲与替代伴侣的可得性:“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的奉献精神
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1785-1791. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0716-4. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Sex, commitment, and casual sex relationships among college men: a mixed-methods analysis.大学生群体中的性别、承诺和随意性关系:混合方法分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 May;42(4):561-71. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0047-z. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners.浪漫伴侣、朋友、炮友和普通熟人作为性伴侣。
J Sex Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;48(6):554-64. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.535623. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
9
"It Is A Purposefully Ambiguous Term": Examining Emerging Adults' Definitions of Hooking Up and How They Vary by Sex/Gender and Educational Background.“这是一个有意模糊的术语”:审视成年早期人群对 hookup 的定义,以及其在性别和教育背景上的差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2711-2725. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02911-8. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Perceptions of partner's deception in friends with benefits relationships.伴侣在互惠型朋友关系中的欺骗感知。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(1):43-57. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.668513. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional Outcomes of Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences: A Systematic Review.随意性关系和经历的情绪结果:系统评价。
J Sex Res. 2021 Oct;58(8):1069-1084. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1821163. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Queer Intimacies: A New Paradigm for the Study of Relationship Diversity.酷儿亲密关系:关系多样性研究的新范式。
J Sex Res. 2019 May-Jun;56(4-5):556-592. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1531281. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
3
Passion, Intimacy, and Commitment in Casual Sexual Relationships in a Canadian Sample of Emerging Adults.加拿大成年初显期人群中随意性关系中的激情、亲密和承诺。
J Sex Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;55(9):1192-1205. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1399195. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
Evaluations and Future Plans After Casual Sexual Experiences: Differences Across Partner Type.随意性行为体验后的评估和未来计划:伴侣类型的差异。
J Sex Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;55(9):1180-1191. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1298714. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
Gender and Ethnicity in Dating, Hanging Out, and Hooking Up: Sexual Scripts Among Hispanic and White Young Adults.约会、社交与随意性行为中的性别和种族:西班牙裔和白人青年的性脚本
J Sex Res. 2016 Sep;53(7):788-804. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1065954. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Gender and casual sexual activity from adolescence to emerging adulthood: social and life course correlates.从青春期到成年初期的性别与随意性行为:社会及生命历程相关因素
J Sex Res. 2015;52(5):543-57. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.906032. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review.性邂逅文化:综述
Rev Gen Psychol. 2012 Jun 1;16(2):161-176. doi: 10.1037/a0027911.
8
Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners.性沟通、性满意度与炮友和恋人的 condom 使用行为。
J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):74-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.719167. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
9
A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships.同居关系中承诺动态的纵向调查。
J Fam Issues. 2012 Mar 1;33(3):369-390. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11420940. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships.识别和阐明有伴之性友谊关系中的变化。
J Sex Res. 2013;50(1):37-47. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.623797. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

大学生“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的承诺与婚外性行为:性别的调节作用

Commitment and Extra-Dyadic Sexual Activity in College Students' Friends with Benefits Relationships: Moderating Effects of Gender.

作者信息

Thomas Rebecca A, Yndo Monica C, Weston Rebecca

机构信息

Ecampus Research Unit, Oregon State University.

Department of Psychology, Concordia University Texas.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2023 Oct;60(8):1181-1192. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.2022585. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2021.2022585
PMID:35041569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124867/
Abstract

Friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) are a common form of relationship for college students that combine aspects of friendship with sex, yet little is known about commitment in these relationships and whether they are more similar to casual relationships or to romantic relationships. We investigated associations between investment, alternatives, and satisfaction, with commitment (per the Investment Model) in college students' FWBRs and examined how associations between variables differ by participant and partner gender. Primary analyses were conducted with male-female FWBRs ( = 252). Male-male ( = 19) and female-female ( = 4) FWBRs are described. Investment was the strongest predictor of commitment for participants in male-female FWBRs, with commitment higher among women than men when investment was high. Additionally, participants' perceptions that their own and their partners' commitment was asymmetrical, as well as reports of extra-dyadic sexual activity (i.e., sex outside the FWBR) correlated with lower commitment to the FWBR. Overall, results suggest that FWBRs can be distinguished not only from other casual sexual relationships such as hookups but can also be differentiated from romantic relationships. Future research and intervention work should measure commitment and investment to predict how these relationships can persist, as well as transition, over time.

摘要

互利关系(FWBRs)是大学生中常见的一种关系形式,它将友谊与性的元素结合在一起,但对于这些关系中的承诺以及它们更类似于随意关系还是浪漫关系,我们知之甚少。我们研究了大学生FWBRs中投资、替代选择和满意度与承诺(根据投资模型)之间的关联,并考察了变量之间的关联如何因参与者和伴侣的性别而有所不同。主要分析针对男女FWBRs(n = 252)进行。还描述了男男(n = 19)和女女(n = 4)的FWBRs。对于男女FWBRs中的参与者而言,投资是承诺的最强预测因素,当投资较高时,女性的承诺高于男性。此外,参与者认为自己和伴侣的承诺不对称,以及关于关系外性行为(即FWBR之外的性行为)的报告与对FWBR的较低承诺相关。总体而言,结果表明FWBRs不仅可以与其他随意性关系(如一夜情)区分开来,而且也可以与浪漫关系区分开来。未来的研究和干预工作应该衡量承诺和投资,以预测这些关系如何随着时间的推移而持续以及转变。